100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Uk Politics Essay Plans $13.49   Add to cart

Essay

Uk Politics Essay Plans

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Uk Politics Essay Plans

Preview 4 out of 37  pages

  • August 5, 2024
  • 37
  • 2024/2025
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
avatar-seller
Uk Politics Essay Plans

Evaluate the view that there is a crisis of participation in politics in the UK - correct
answers 30 marks



Intro - correct answers Overall, yes, because despite effectiveness of pressure
groups, lobbying and alternate forms of participation like social media, the fact
that people have had to find alternate, non-traditional methods of participation
proves a dissatisfaction with current system, meaning there is participation crisis



P1: party membership vs pressure groups - correct answers - YES, participation
crisis, as traditional forms of participation have decreased

- political party membership has been decreasing since 1980, now less than 1%
currently a member of any party

- suggests lack of faith in political system

- two main parties have become too similar since new labour, e.g. starmer would
not nationalise energy (he said in 2023), meaning labour has shifted right

- leads to people not joining parties

- HOWEVER, work of pressure groups has been significant

- pg = org with a single interest or goal that aims to influence policy

- insider groups like NICE work with the gov, BMA represents around 160,000
doctors

- 2011, greenpeace launched campaign to stop practice of tuna fishing and by 2014
all UK supermarkets announced they wouldnt purchase tuna fished unsustainably

- ppl not joining parties because theyre joining pgs?

,- however, still a failure of political system as pressure groups not always effective
and if people require alternative avenue of participation, means there is a crisis



P2: low turnout vs other forms of participation - correct answers - YES,
participation crisis, as turnout is regularly quite low, suggesting either people not
informed or not interested in voting

- G.E turnouts

- 2001: 59% (lowest ever), 2005: 61%, 2010: 65%, 2017: 69%, 2019: 67%

- young people less likely to vote, ethnic minorities less likely to vote etc

- local elections turnout around 30%

- disillusionment with system

- FPTP leads to wasted votes

- HOWEVER, turnout has increased since 2001

- referenda tend to have high turnout e.g. Brexit 2016 turnout was 72%

- people participating through other means

- e.g. 1.6m signed a petition to stop trump making state visit to UK in 2018, was
changed from state to 'working' visit

- 2017 - "youthquake" - corbyn's facebook page outscored theresa may's 5 million
vs 771,000



Evaluate the view that think-tanks, pressure groups and lobbyists have little impact
on government decisions - correct answers 30 marks

,P1: work alongside gov vs gov sovereignty - correct answers - YES have impact, as
they can work alongside the gov and with the gov to create policy and make
decisions representing the people

- Taxpayers alliance is a pressure groups with links to cons

- national farmers union represents 55,000 members and is representative body
for agriculture and horticulture, and works with gov, e.g. submitted written
evidence to parliament for creation of agriculture bill 2020

- adam smith institute is a think tank focusing on free market economics

- CBI (confederate of british industry) has managed to pressure gov to give more
power to devolved govs

- pressure groups act as another way of participating and another source of info
for the gov to best govern the country, therefore do have impact

- HOWEVER, parliament is still sovereign, as gov created from parl, gov has power
to ignore pressure groups, think tanks and lobbyists

- pressure groups only effective if the government decides to consult them or does
not ignore them

- during RMT and doctors and nurses strikes of 2022 and 2023, keir starmer
refused to support the trade unions, and sacked labour mp sam tarry for doing
broadcast interviews from a rail strike picket line in 2022



P2: representing voices in society vs time it takes to make a significant difference -
correct answers - YES, have impact as they can represent voices in society that fly
under radar, and through protesting, lobbying, campaigning, force the gov to make
certain decisions

- BMA (representing 160,000 doctor) lobbied policy makers and as a result health
care act 2022 passed, making it easier for health orgs to deliver joined-up care for
people relying on multiple different servies

, - greenpeace pressure the gov - gov then announced ban of sale of new diesel and
petrol cars from 2030

- greenpeace also pressure in 2011 against unsustainably sourced tuna, from 2014
it was banned in uk supermarkets

- HOWEVER, clearly an arduous process, took three years for tuna ban and the
extension of the ULEZ in 2019 came two years after greenpeace published a report
on air pollution

- clearly more difficult for outsider groups to make a difference



Evaluate the view that the franchise needs to be extended to 16-17 year olds -
correct answers 30 marks



Intro: - correct answers - franchise does need to extended 16-17 year olds

-



P1: improve democracy by increasing turnout vs young people not as politically
interested - correct answers - scotland passed the scottish elections (reduction of
voting age) act allowing 16-17 year olds to vote and they voted in 2014
independence referendum

- turnout was 85% in referendum, and turnout of those aged 16-17 was 75%, while
turnout in g.es (where 16-17s cannot vote) has been historically low (2001: 59%)

- young people clearly interested in being politically involved, and when given
vote, would likely vote

HOWEVER: turnout is low generally, including 18-21, suggesting 16-17s would not
vote either

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Schoolflix. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$13.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart