100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Complete APM PMQ Complete Revision Notes (with notes, essay answers, assessment criteria) $81.75   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Complete APM PMQ Complete Revision Notes (with notes, essay answers, assessment criteria)

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

These are all my revision notes used to sit the APM PMQ exam in April (passed first time with a score over 70%). They include: 1. Revision notes for each learning objective in every module (1-11) 2. Example essay answers for each learning objective in every module (1-11) 3. The assessment cri...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 205  pages

  • July 31, 2024
  • 205
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
APM PMQ Revision


APM PMQ REVISION
Command Verbs:

Verb Definition
Differentiate Recognise or determine what makes something different.
Describe Give an account, including all the relevant characteristics, qualities and events.
Explain Give an account of the purpose(s) or reason(s).
Interpret Translate information/data into another form to aid understanding, to
demonstrate understanding or to inform a future action.
Outline/state Set out the main points/characteristics.

Acronyms:

Acronym Meaning
BAU Business as usual
CBS Cost breakdown structure
OBS Organisational breakdown structure
RAM Responsibility assignment matrix
PBS Product breakdown structure
PMP Project management plan
WBS Work breakdown structure

,APM PMQ Revision


MODULE 1 – SITUATIONAL CONTEXT

STRUCTURE OF ORGANISATIONS AND PROJECTS

1.1 - Differentiate between types of permanent and temporary organisation structures (including
functional, matrix, and project

Possible Exam Questions:

Questions Prompts
Explain three differences between the following 1. Line management structure
types of organisational structure: 2. The kind of work that they are doing
• Functional 3. The speed with which they can enact change
• Matrix
Marks: 30 marks (10 marks each)
Explain three differences between the following 1. Line management structure
types of organisational structure: 2. Longevity of the organisation
• Functional 3. The kind of work that they are doing
• Project
Marks: 30 marks (10 marks each)


Permanent/Temporary Definitions:

Organizational structures define how roles, responsibilities, and power are assigned and controlled to
achieve strategic objectives, and how information flows between different levels of management.

1 Permanent Organisation Structure

 Stable team – good for routine/operational work as it provides a stable environment to support
decision making and the flow of information across an organisation
 Business as usual (BAU) or operations within an organisation are permanent structures that
need specific resources to carry out routine tasks. In this case, a stable team is best to fulfil the
role. By being stable, the team will be specialists within the role and therefore bring efficiencies
to the tasks

2 Temporary Organisation Structure
 Temporary teams set up for specific initiatives e.g projects
 Projects are temporary, as is the participating team. The team can be sourced from different
functional units or source people from outside the business. The number of team members can
vary from project concept through to transition to the wider business.
 A project environment is temporary, where the tasks are varied and unique, therefore the
environment is more suited to temporary teams who bring different skills to the tasks as
required.

The matrix structure is one of the most common temporary structures used to manage projects, where
authority is balanced between the functional line manager and the project manager. The project
manager works across both temporary and permanent structures.

,APM PMQ Revision


Matrix/Functional/Project Definitions

1 Matrix Organisation Structure

 A matrix structure is chosen for companies when it benefits them to share skills across different
departments. This allows the team to tap experts from different areas of business on one larger
project without hiring more talent or redesigning the organization
 PM’s typically have authority for the project and functional managers have authority over the
welfare of staff and efficiency of their department – balance of authority between both. Need to
ensure good interpersonal relationships and effective communication (more complex than in
functional). PM is not line manager so no structural power to get things done - relies on project
managers understanding of how they can influence others in the absence of organizational
authority within line management.
 Projects resourced from drawing full or part time staff from individual departments

Strengths:
 Brings together highly skilled team members from different departments, allowing the
organization to capitalize on the resources it already has rather than seeking expertise and
recruiting project team members from outside of the organization
 Equal focus on task completion and staff development
 Project is likely to be visible to the whole organization, rather than just an individual
department as in the functional structure

Weaknesses:
 When an individual is working on the project, they are reporting to the project manager as
well as their functional line manager (dual reporting) and there can be a conflict of
priorities/objectives/management styles
 Decisions must go through multiple people before being approved
 Confusion surrounding roles and responsibilities
 More expensive

2 Functional Organisation Structure
 Organises the company into different departments based on areas of expertise, and groups
employees by specialty, skill or related roles, these people work together to carry out the same
or similar functions
o Example – Lawyers in Legal and Marketers in Marketing
 Functional managers have complete control and head up single discipline departments that
functional staff report to
 Ideal for small, routine, mainly internal projects close to BAU activity rather than for incremental
improvement

Strengths:
 Expertise and learning is easily shared
 Clear reporting structure
 Good where focus of organisation is ‘running the company’


Weaknesses:

, APM PMQ Revision


 Projects are a distraction
 No single point of contact – leads to inconsistent communication
 Staff may focus on their own areas when making a decision on a project
 Hard to collaborate with other functions as they aren’t used to it – often there are already
conflicts here between functions
 Staff are more loyal to functional managers

3 Project Organisation Structure

 Project manager has complete authority over work and staff are assigned full time to a specific
project
 Projects form the majority of the work and the PM may also have responsibility for the
wellbeing and development of staff
 Common for organisations with project based staff e.g consultancies
 Organisations is made up of projects, each having a project manager or project director,
depending on the size of the project, reporting directly to the board of what is often a holding
company.
 The structure consists of groups of people who are all dedicated only to the project assigned
and report to the project director daily.
 All work is project related and once the project is completed (projects using this structure may
last for many years) that part of the organisation ceases to exist
 Project may have their own equivalent of BAU service lines e.g procurement, finance, HR etc

Strengths:
 PM is single point of contact and has authority, meaning different functional disciplines are
likely to integrate better
 Focus is just on the project
 Clear project processes combined with well-defined roles and responsibilities mean that
teams become technically proficient

Weaknesses:
 Staff become insecure as project ends
 Inefficient resource utilisation
 Sharing of experience is difficult
 The very strong job security while the project is being carried out is then a weakness at
project completion when there is no longer a requirement for the people who were
employed in delivery
 Projects can also become very insular and not communicate with each other this can lead to
underutilization of staff overall as availability in one project is not used to solve a need in
anothe
 Once each project is completed, teams will leave on mass and the organization may not get
the opportunity to maintain the learning gained by the individuals while working on the
project.



Differences between functional/matrix/project

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sienamilner. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $81.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$81.75
  • (0)
  Add to cart