100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
Evaluate whether a firm should always shut down if its costs of production are greater than its revenue - 20/20 Full Economics Essay Answer: January 2021 Economics Unit 3 Paper on Business Behaviour (WEC13/01)$4.49
Add to cart
Evaluate whether a firm should always shut down if its costs of production are greater than its revenue - 20/20 Full Economics Essay Answer: January 2021 Economics Unit 3 Paper on Business Behaviour (WEC13/01)
14 views 1 purchase
Course
Pearson International Advanced Level Economics
Institution
Pearson International Advanced Level Economics
Book
Pearson Edexcel International a Level Economics Student Book Ebook
This is a full mark (20/20) essay written for Question 10, section C of the January 2021 Economics Unit 3 Paper on Business Behaviour (WEC13/01). It answers: "Evaluate whether a firm should always shut down if its costs of production are greater than its revenue. Refer to an industry of your choice...
Evaluate the extent to which different business objectives may affect a firm’s profits – 20/20 Full Economics Essay Answer: October 2020 Economics Unit 3 Paper on Business Behaviour (WEC13/01)
Evaluate why some firms remain small: 20/20 Full Economics Exam Essay Answer - October 2020 (IAL)
20/20 Economics Exam Essay - Evaluate the benefits of takeovers for growth
All for this textbook (6)
Written for
Pearson International Advanced Level Economics
All documents for this subject (4)
Seller
Follow
ilhamedib
Reviews received
Content preview
January 2021, Section C, Question 9, International Advanced Level Unit 3:
Business behaviour, WEC13/01
The short-run shut down point occurs where average revenue is equal to
average variable costs (point A on the figure below), whereas the long-run
shutdown point is where average revenue is equal to average costs (point
B).
In the short run, a firm may not necessarily shut down if its costs of
production are greater than its revenues. This is because, even if average
total costs (ATCs) exceed average revenues (ARs), as long as average
variable costs (AVCs) of production are still being covered by revenue, the
firm may opt to continue operations. This is illustrated in the figure above,
where a firm generating AR at or above point A (where AR = AVC) may
continue operating despite making a loss of P1.A.D.C1. This is because,
theory suggests that as long as AR exceeds AVC, the firm can still
contribute towards covering some of its fixed costs. Consequently, it is
economically advantageous, and less costly, for the firm to persist with
production, considering that shutting-down would incur the loss of all fixed
costs. However, if AR falls below P1, potentially due to reduced demand, a
firm may choose to shut down in the short term, as they would be
, incapable of covering their AVCs. Thus, total losses suffered would be
greater than if production had just stopped. As such, in the short term, a
firm’s decision to shut down hinges on its ability to cover AVCs with
revenue, with a firm potentially choosing to cease operations if AVCs
surpass ARs.
Nonetheless, a firm may not always shut down in the short term, even
when its ARs fall below AVCs, as these losses may be incurred as part of a
strategic move within a predatory pricing strategy aimed at eliminating
competitors and establishing market dominance. This is notably
exemplified by Uber’s strategy to enter the Indian ride-hailing industry,
where it deliberately set prices below not only its own AVCs, but also
below those of competitors like “Ola”, as illustrated by the price level P2.
part of a predatory pricing strategy used to eliminate competition and
gain a dominant market position. This was a strategy pursued by Uber
when it attempted to break into the Indian ride-hailing industry, where it
purposely priced its services below the average costs of production
incurred by not only itself, but other firms, like Ola, at P2 in the figure
below. Despite generating massive losses of C2.X.Y.P2 and operating
below the short-run shut-down point, Uber did not shut down. This is
because, the use of predatory pricing is often seen as a temporary
strategy used to attract customers from other firms, thus driving out
competition and increasing their own market share. Through this, Uber
was able to gain a significant foothold in the market, enabling them to
raise prices once established to recoup their losses. As such, despite
earning average revenues lower than AVCs in the short-run, firms may not
always shut down if this is a part of a longer-term strategy to gain
dominance in the market.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ilhamedib. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
