100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
AQA Psychology A-Level : ATTACHMENT (paper 1) $7.93   Add to cart

Class notes

AQA Psychology A-Level : ATTACHMENT (paper 1)

 19 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

☆ Full attachment notes, condensed yet detailed enough to reach highest marks ☆ Key psychologists and case studies ☆ High quality - I used multiple sources including AQA Textbooks, Powerpoints etc. ☆ Diagrams and other images included to boost studying effectively

Preview 3 out of 26  pages

  • June 19, 2024
  • 26
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Miss murray
  • All classes
avatar-seller
, Caregiver -
Infant Interactions




* Attachment is an emotional tie or bond between two
people ,
usually a
primary caregiver and a child
.

3 The (shared) it
relationship is reciprocal , which means that a
two-way relationship that endures over time
.




RECIPROCITY

* Reciprocity is when an infant responds to the actions of another in form of
turn-taking With
person a
.

reciprocity , the actions of one
person (ive caregive elicits a
response from the other (ie the infant)
.

* Brezelton et d .
(1975) describe this interaction as a dance' because when a
couple dance together they

respond to anothers movement
each one and
rhythm .




* Feldman (2007) ,
reciprocity increases in
frequency as the infant and
coreginer pay increasing attention to each other's


veoal and facial communications
.


It is suggested that this sensitive the attention sensitively
showing responsiveness whereby caregiver pays
-



,




infant's foundations for attachment to later between
towards the behaviour ,
will lay the
strong develop the


caregiver and infant .




INTERACTIONAL SYNCHRONY
* expressions).
Interactional
synchrony takes
place when infants mirror actions or emotions of another
person (eg · facial

↳ This referred to imitation adult's
mirroring can also be as or
simply copying the behaviour
.



* In this caregiver infant interaction the child will move their
body out the same act as their
or
carry
-




caregiver simultaneously and the two are said to be synchronised (in sync) .
* This interaction serves to sustain communication between the two individuals
.




MELTZOFF AND MOORE (1977)
AIM :
To interactional in infants
examine
synchrony .



of
METHOD :
Using a controlled observation ,
an edult model
displayed one three facid expressions , or hand .
gesture

1 start child had placed in his/her mouth to
prevent facial
.
To with ,
the a
dummy a
response
.



.
2
Following the
display from a dult
the model ,
the dummy was removed and the child's expressions

were filmed
.


·

RESULTS : There was a clear association between the infant's behaviour and that of the adult model . Later


research
by Meltzoff and Moore (1983) found the same
findings in
three-day-old infants .


These interestiend innate of
CONCLUSION
findings suggest that
synchrony is and reduces the strength
:
any

claim that unitative behaviour is learned
.




EVALUATION :
CAREGIVER-INFANT INTERACTIONS




RELIABILITY OF TESTING INFANTS


P :
Research has been criticised on the premise that infant behaviour is difficult to reliably test .




E :
This is because it is difficult to
distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours
.




For example ,
Infant's mouths are
constantly moving and
they frequently smile/ yown/poke their
tongue out
,


which are tested expressions in research
.



difficult
L Therefore it to know whether behaviour whether it
naturally
:
, is is a
response ,
or is
ocaving
.
:
C However Meltzoff and Moore independent watched videos of
, overcame this
by using assessors who



infant
responses and made judgements on what was
being imitated ,
increasining the intena validity
.

, FAILURE TO REPLICATE

P limitation creginer-infant interactions failed to
:
A of into
research is that other research has
replicate
and
findings support the theories
.



E :
Koepke (1983) failed to
replicate Meltzoff and Moore's
findings ,
however Koepke was criticised for

being less
carefully controlled
.


E Furthermore Marian tried
et d to
replicate the study by Murray and Trevathen and found that
:
.

,




infants couldn't interactions
distinguish live from videotaped with mothers
. This suggests that the infants
e re



not
actually responding to the adult ,
and behaviour is wisted due to chance /rather than intentional)
.
L :
Therefore ,
evidence from other research casts doubt on these theories
·




INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES


P :
Another limitation of the that it not the individual differences between infants
theory is does consider


that effect their behaviours .
may

E :
Isabells et d (1989) found that more
strongly attached infant core-giver pairs showed greater interactional

between attachment and interactional
synchrony ,
suggesting a link
synchrony
.

E :
In addition ,
Heimann (1989) showed that infants who demonstrate a let of imitation from
bith orwards


have been found to have a better quality of relationship at three months , although cause and effect


is not dear


7 Therefore limitation all
of
theory infants respond
:
,
a this is that it assumes will in the same way , when



in
reality it be different from infant to infant
may
.




RESEARCH SUPPORT

P :
A
strength of these caregiver -
infant theories is that research has been conducted that
supports that


behaviour is intentional .




E :
Abravanel and DeYong (1991) observed infant behaviour when
interacting with two manimate objects ,
one




stimulating tongue movements and the other opening/closing the mouth
.


E :
They found that infants /median age 5-12 weeks) made little response to the
objects
.




1 don't
this that infants imitate it
specific
:
Therefore , concludes just anything they see ; is a
response to


other humans of infant interactions
supporting the idea caregiver .
-

,

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller olivia06. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.93. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79789 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.93
  • (0)
  Add to cart