100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Contract - Remedies (Summary and Exam Approach to Question) $9.41   Add to cart

Summary

Contract - Remedies (Summary and Exam Approach to Question)

1 review
 219 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

(Distinction level notes). Summary of how to approach the Remedies question in the BPP GDL Contract exam. Set out in the exact exam structure BPP encourage students to adopt (including all required definitions, key cases and principles). Covers assessment of unliquidated damages (expectation intere...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • May 7, 2019
  • 4
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: wilsonwilson • 4 year ago

avatar-seller
Consolidation – Exemption Clauses II

Lyla owns a small children’s nursery called ‘Mucky Duck Day Care’ (‘MDDC’). She wants to be able to take
the children out for walks in the countryside. She visits ‘Mums & Dads’, a leading global nursery retailer, to
look for a pram. She explains to the shop assistant that she will be using the pram along the rugged hillside
paths that surround MDDC. The shop assistant suggests the 'Pushmepullyou' pram, describing it as ‘perfect
for off-road territory’. Lyla says that it sounds ideal.

The shop assistant asks her to sign a form headed: 'Mums & Dads – What You Need to Know'. Lyla asks
what she is signing and the shop assistant replies, 'Oh, you know ... the usual'. Lyla signs it without reading
it and hands over her money. Lyla does not notice that the form contains Mums & Dads’ standard terms and
conditions in very small writing. Clause five of the standard terms and conditions states that:

‘Mums & Dads accepts no liability for breach of any express or implied terms.’

Lyla decides to take the Pushmepullyou for a test run before using it to transport any children. Lyla is
irritated as the steering does not work properly on uneven surfaces. A short while later, as she is pushing
the pram down a steep hill, the brakes fail causing the pram to collide with a lorry. Lyla escapes without
injury, but the pram is damaged beyond repair.

Lyla contacts Better Builders plc, a large construction company, as she wants to build an extension to the
nursery. Mr Green, the owner of Better Builders plc, visits Lyla’s nursery to assess the job and then sends
her a written quotation for the work. At the bottom of the written quotation, there is a sentence in red which
states:

‘Better Builders plc accepts no liability for any loss or damage howsoever caused.’

Lyla does not notice this clause. Lyla is happy with the quotation and telephones Mr Green to accept.

On the day that Better Builders plc starts work, one of its workmen drills into an electric cable, causing a fire.
Lyla suffers lung damage from smoke inhalation and the damage to MDDC is estimated at £10,000.

Advise the parties as to any rights and liabilities which may arise in the law of contract.

MDDC v MUMS &DADS
 Identify type of contract: B2B
 Terms:
o Express oral term = ‘Perfect for off-road territory’
o SGA = Implied terms:
 S14(2) – Goods of a satisfactory quality (applies because goods purchased in course of business).
 14(3) – Fit for purpose (applies because L has communicated to seller purpose for which they
need it).
Express Oral Term
 ‘Perfect for off-road territory’.
o Timing – Routledge v McKay (Made just before entering into the contract).
o Importance – Bannerman v White (made known importance for business purpose at the time of
contracting).
o Specialist knowledge – Oscar Chess; Dick Bentley – Disparity of knowledge – salesperson should know
about the prams. They have the greater level of knowledge.
 BREACH: The pram is clearly not perfect for off-road terrain – it cannot be used there without breaking.
 CATEGORISATION: Can we argue it goes to the root of the contract?
o At least an argument it could be a condition – it goes to the root of the contract for the purpose
communicated.
o Alternatively – could be an innominate term. Hong Kong Fir – Does it deprive the innocent party of
substantially whole of the benefit of the contract? – Yes, it has been rendered entirely unusable as a
result of it not being perfect for off-road terrain.
o Therefore will be an innominate term treated like a condition.
 REMEDY: Terminate + Damages.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Als1994. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.41. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79316 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.41  3x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart