100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Jurisprudence: Marx, Feminism, Critical Race Theory and Realism $7.99   Add to cart

Class notes

Jurisprudence: Marx, Feminism, Critical Race Theory and Realism

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Provides substantial information about feminist, marxist and critical theorist thought on law and its purpose. Also deals with the American jurisprudence of Legal Realism.

Preview 3 out of 18  pages

  • May 4, 2024
  • 18
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Haniya
  • All classes
avatar-seller
JURISPRUDENCE-II


Legal Realism
 Legal realism arose as a reaction to formalism.
 Formalism argues that the law can determine the outcome of any case
without influence of external factors.
 While formalism itself is anti-metaphysical and positivist, realists believe
that it is still too abstract.
 Realists say that formalism is too ‘syllogistic’, and it undervalues the role
that judges play in making law and their discretion.
 Realists sought to increase knowledge in all fields based only upon
empirical evidence (evidence which can be acquired through the senses).
 This was opposed to the knowledge acquired through a priori reasoning;
knowledge acquired without the senses, through logic and reasoning.
Example; a sharp object will cause bleeding; this can be said without
experiencing it.
 Realists want jurisprudence to come out of concepts and be directed
towards how the law is experienced in real-time.
 The main focus of realism is to gather and study facts relevant to the field
of law, in order to predict what a judge may do.
 They believe that judges merely react to the facts which they are
presented and then determine what seems fair to them, rather than relying
on legal rules and principles.
o This is to say that every judicial decision is influenced by the

judge’s political and moral considerations rather than legal.
o Furthermore, to believe this is to say that the legal rules and

principles can’t determine with certainty what the outcome of a
case will be.

, The thought of realists has been dominated and influenced on a large part
by Oliver Wendell Holmes.
 He says that the law is not merely logic but also experienced, therefore
the law is only a prediction of what the court will do and what the
individual will experience.
 Holmes says that law can be understood if one sees through the lens of a
‘bad man’.
o A bad man will only look towards the consequences of doing

certain actions, and for that, he will rely on experiential knowledge.
o A bad man does not care about legal concepts like justice and

innocence, he is only concerned with what a judge will decide.
 Holmes believed that law could be developed using the terms of science;
by the accumulation of facts through which one can predict the outcome
of a case.
o That law can be predicted and its postulates are established from

‘accurately measured’ social desires.
o This means the reliance of legal development upon social sciences

like psychology and economics.
 Jerome Frank: he was another staunch legal realist whose main
contribution was the distinction he drew between rule-sceptics and fact-
sceptics, both a part of realism.
 Rule sceptics believe that the uncertainty in law can be traced to legal
rules.
 Fact sceptics believe that this uncertainty is the result of the nature of
facts and their interpretation.
 Frank says that the law is not certain, if it was, there would be no need to
litigate, since everyone would know the decision.
o The fact that the majority of cases have no disputed matter of law,

is evidence that the law is inherently uncertain.

, o He believes our need for certainty in law is linked to our instinct of

safety and security
 One can never tell how the facts of a case may impact the judge or jury
and which way it might go.
 Karl Llewellyn thinks of law as an institution, it has a specific function
to perform, a ‘job to do’.
 In describing these jobs, Llewellyn lays out what he believes is the
function of law;
o Dealing with trouble cases.

o Preventive channelling of conduct and expectations; preventing ill-

conduct and expectations.
o Preventive ‘rechannelling’ of conduct and expectations to adapt to

change.
o Allocation of authority and determining procedures for decision

making.
o Providing direction and incentive.

o Job of the juristic method; the development of skills, techniques,

methods and traditions of the law as an institution.
 This development of skills and techniques etc. is what Llewellyn calls a
‘craft’. The law is a practice of this craft.
o It is passed down through generations as education and practical

knowledge.
 Llewellyn believes that there is a large amount of ‘predictability’ in the
courts, as opposed to Jerome Frank.
o This is because of the general craft which has been passed down

through the generations.
 This predictability can be seen because of a ‘period style’ which is found
in the courts.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hassimukhti. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76800 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart