Summary
Summary OCR A Level Law: Human Rights in Domestic Law
- Course
- Institution
Comprehensive Summary of everything you need to know for OCR A Level Law, Paper 3, Section B: Human Rights Law. All case law and Legislation provided
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
marcoxue15
Reviews received
Content preview
Human Rights in English LawRestrictions to Articles 5 and 6 ECHR
Police Powers under Police And Criminal Evidence Act 1984 give the police powers to
Kettle, Stop and Search, Arrest, Detain and Exclude Evidence.
Kettling
Kettling is a form of lawful deprivation of liberty under Article 5 ECHR, where a group of
people in a demonstration and/or protest are held by the police as a control measure,
preventing their departure. In order for this lawful deprivation, it must be sanctioned by the
state, against the will of the detainees, for a set period of time. This must be a necessary
and proportionate response to a perceived risk (Austin v Commissioner of the Police of
the Metropolis), and used only as a last resort, against an identifiable risk (R v
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis).
Stop and Search
- Under S1 PACE 1984, a constable may search any person or vehicle if he has
reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find stolen or prohibited articles.
Reasonable grounds are not defined under the act, but must be based more on
personal factors.
- Under S2 PACE 1984, the name and station of officer, and reason for stop and
search must be given.
- Under S3 PACE 1984, they are required to give a copy of the stop and search.
- Under S117 PACE 1984, the police may use reasonable force in conducting the stop
and search.
These must all adhere to the limitations under the conditions of restriction under Article 5(1)
ECHR.
This means that there must be evidence of suspicious activity to warrant the stop and search
(R (Gillian) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis): proportionate threat to the
capital.
Under S60 Criminal Justice Public Order Act 1994, the police have the right to search
people without particular suspicion in a particular area where they believe with good reason
that: serious violence will take place and act to prevent it; person is carrying dangerous
object/weapon; incident involving serious violence with a weapon has or is about to occur,
and they use to recover it (R (Roberts) v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis):
no breach, done in accordance with law, not racial discrimination.
, Human Rights in English Law
Arrest
PACE 1984, provides statutory authority on a person’s rights upon arrest and sets out a
number of rights afforded to a detained person under their Codes of Practice.
Under S24 PACE, a constable may arrest without a warrant, anyone who is about to commit
an offence, anyone who is in the act of committing an offence, anyone whom he has
reasonable grounds for suspecting to commit an offence, or anyone who he has reasonable
grounds for suspecting to be committing an offence.
Reasonable grounds are defined as when a mere opportunity to commit an offence could
constitute sufficient grounds for suspicion of guilt for an arrest (Cumming and Others v
Chief Constable of Northumbria Police).
When someone is arrested, under S28 PACE states that they must be told of the grounds of
their arrest, they should be properly cautioned (given their Miranda Rights), they should be
informed of their right to silence and warned of the inferences drawn under s37 CJPOA
1994, and they must be told of their right to private legal consultation under s58 CJPOA
1994. (R v Samuel): denied access to lawyer so police breached their duty
Under s37 PACE 1984, when someone is detained, the custody officer will decide whether
there is sufficient evidence to charge a suspect, if so, detained under s38 PACE 1984. They
can be detained for up to 24 hours.
Under s76 PACE 1984, a confession can be excluded if it has been obtained by oppression
or deception.
McKay v UK: two periods of arrest.
Arrest: suspect must be brought “promptly” before the courts
Pre-trial/remand: trial must take place within “reasonable time / release pending trial”
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller marcoxue15. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.42. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now