SSL101c(300+)_P3.5_4.1 questions and answers 100%verified
6 views 0 purchase
Course
SSL101c_P3.5_4.1
Institution
SSL101c_P3.5_4.1
3.5.1.1, Read the following argument. Identify which sentences are part of the argument chain.
(1) A significant percentage of people experiencing homelessness are aged between 0-24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory ...
SSL101c(300+)_P3.5_4.1 questions and answers 100%verified 3.5.1.1, Read the following argument. Identify which sentences are part of the argument chain. (1) A significant percentage of people experiencing homelessness are aged between 0 -24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities. (3) If there was increased funding for exit planning then youth at risk would have more opportunities for support. (4) If there were more opportunities for support then there would be a higher chance of intervention when at -risk youth face homelessness. (5) This would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. (6) Therefore, funding for better exit planning would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. Check one option. a.Every sentence b.Sentences 1, 2 and 3 c.Sentences 3, 4 and 5 d.Sentences 3, 4, 5 and 6 - D 3.5.1.2, Read the following argument. Is sentence (5) an appropriate sentence for a chain argument? (1) A significant percentage of people experiencing homelessness are aged between 0 -24 years of age. (2) One contributing factor for youth homelessness is a lack of exit planning after leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities. (3) If there was increased funding for exit planning then youth at risk would have more opportunities for support. (4) If there were more opportunities for support then there would be a higher chance of intervention when at -risk youth face homelessness. (5) This would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. (6) Therefore, funding for better exit planning would lead to a decrease in youth homelessness. Check one option. a.Yes, because it is a conclusion to the argument. b.Yes, because it links the previous premise with a new premise. c.No, because the antecedent (the 2nd pa - B 3.5.1.3, Read the following statement. What is the purpose of the argument? If there was increased funding for exit planning for youth leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities then there would be a decrease in youth homelessness. There is not increased funding, so there will not be a decrease in youth homeles sness. Choose one option. a.To prove a point b.To refute an idea c.To warn the audience of a terrible mistake d.Slippery slope - A 3.5.1.4, Read the following statement. What is the problem with the conclusion? If there was increased funding for exit planning for youth leaving statutory care, juvenile justice or medical facilities then there would be a decrease in youth homelessness. There is not increased funding, so there will not be a decrease in youth homeles sness. Check two options. 1. It is not the most logical outcome of the premise. 2. It does not use necessary hedging, or cautious, language. 3. Nothing, it is a good argument. 4. The conclusion is not a logical consequence of the premises. - 1 2 3.5.1.5, Read the following statement. What is wrong with the argument? If there is no funding for exit planning for young people leaving juvenile justice then those at -risk youth will not have adequate support or stability. If they don't have adequate support or stability they will not be able to focus on their studies. If th ose youth are unable to focus on their studies they will drop out of school. If they drop out of school they will not be able to gain employment or be engaged meaningfully. This would lead them to a life of petty crime and worse. Check two options. 1. The premises do not logically follow each other . 2. The premises do not present the most logical progression. 3. There are too many generalizations and assumptions for the argument to be convincing. 4. There is no conclusion. - 2 3 3.5.2.1, Consider the following argument.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller CleanA. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
