100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Economics 1123 Midterm Exam | GRADED A $13.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Economics 1123 Midterm Exam | GRADED A

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Department of Economics Economics 1123 Harvard University Fall 2020 Midterm Exam 9:00 a.m., Wednesday October 24, 2018 PACKET 2 Solutions in Calibri 11 Part 1 – USE BLUE BOOK #1 (60 points) 1) Consider regressions (1) and (2). a) (5 points) Interpret the coefficient on license...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • March 15, 2024
  • 10
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Department of Economics Economics 1123
Harvard University Fall 2020


Midterm Exam
9:00 a.m., Wednesday October 24, 2018


PACKET 2


Solutions in Calibri 11

Part 1 – USE BLUE BOOK #1 (60 points)

1) Consider regressions (1) and (2).
a) (5 points) Interpret the coefficient on license in regression (1), in which the
dependent variable is wage.

The mean wage for workers with a license is $2.76 higher than for those without a license.

b) (5 points) Based on the evidence in the tables and/or figures, is the regression error
in regression (1) heteroskedastic or homoskedastic? Briefly explain.

Heteroskedasticity is when the variance of the regression error depends on X. In regression (1),
heteroskedasticity arises when the variance of wages differs for those with and without a
license. Figure 1 suggests that it does, in particular the spread of the distribution of wages for
those with a license exceeds that for those without a license.

c) (5 points) Interpret the coefficient on license in regression (2), in which the
dependent variable is log(wage). Is this coefficient large or small in a real-world
sense?

The mean wage for workers with a license is 18.9% higher than for those without a license. That
is a lot in a real world sense, a 20% “raise”.

2) Consider regression (8), in which the dependent variable is the binary variable license.
a) (5 points). There are only four education variables in this regression, but there are five
in Table 1: the regression omits highschool. What would happen if highschool were
included?

There would be perfect multicolinearity, because the sum of the education variables would
1

, equal 1, which is the constant regressor.

b) (4 points). Interpret the coefficient on hsdropout.

Holding constant sex, workers who did not finish high school have a 4.5 percentage points lower
probability of having a license than workers with (only) a high school diploma.

c) (4 points). Interpret the pattern of coefficients on the four education variables.

The probability of having a required occupational license increases with the amount of
education.

3) Consider regression (3).
a) (5 points). The coefficient on license changes substantially from regression (2) to (3).
Explain why the coefficient changed and provide an explanation of the sign (direction)
of the change.

Regression (2) evidently suffered from omitted variable bias. In particular, the amount of
education is positively correlated with license (regression (8)) and workers with higher education
earn more generally (that is the pattern of the coefficients on education in regression (3)). Thus,
when the amount of education is omitted in (2), license captures both the effect of a license and
the effect of having more education.

b) (5 points). Test the hypothesis that all four of the education variables have
coefficients that equal zero, against the alternative that at least one is nonzero.

This is done using the F-test on the four education coefficients. The F-statsitic is 1234 which has
a p-value <0.000 so the hypothesis is rejected at the 1% significance level.

c) (5 points). Sketch the shape of the estimated relation between log(wage) and age. Briefly
interpret this shape in words. NOTE: You need not evaluate the regression function with
a calculator or have numerical values on the axis – just sketch the shape.




2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller QUICKEXAMINER. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$13.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart