100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Depression Part 2 Complete Summary - 3.4 Affective Disorders 2024 $9.75   Add to cart

Summary

Depression Part 2 Complete Summary - 3.4 Affective Disorders 2024

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Complete and extensive summary for week 2 of the course 3.4 Affective Disorders, year 2023/2024. Grade received = 8.3!

Preview 4 out of 42  pages

  • March 12, 2024
  • 42
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
3.4 Affective Disorders
Week 2




Depression Part 2

,Sex Differences in Depression
Kendler & Gardner (2014)

Sex Differences in the Pathways to Major Depression: A Study of
Opposite-Sex Twin Pairs
Introduction
● Women have a consistently higher rate of MDD than men
● Etiological pathways for this finding have been explored in previous research (single
risk factors)
○ Marital status/quality
○ Stressful life events
○ Prior anxiety disorders
○ Personality
○ Ruminative propensity
● Because of the genetic and environmental familial factors in MDD, delineating risk
factors that differentiate sexes would be facilitated if there was a design controlling
for sex differences
○ This study → co-twin control design in opposite-sex dizygotic twin pairs (optimal
sample for studying sex differences)

Method
● Sample
○ Started with 9.400 individuals that were twins from Virginia (1940-1974)
○ Final interview 1.000 participants at around 37 years of age
● Outcome variable
○ Participants were asked about the occurrence of 15 DSM-III symptoms for an
MDD in the past year
● Model variables
○ Five developmental periods
■ Childhood → familial risk, low parental warmth, sexual abuse, parental
loss
■ Early adolescence → neuroticism, low self-esteem, early-onset anxiety,
conduct disorder
■ Late adolescence → low educational achievement, lifetime traumas,
nicotine dependence, alcohol and drug use disorders
■ Adulthood → divorce, past history of MDD, low social support
■ Past year → marital satisfaction, distal stressful life events, dependent
proximal and independent proximal stressful life events
● Statistical methods

, ○ Divided into 2 groups so that one member of each pair was present in each
group
○ Genetic and environmental influences were balanced across groups

Results
● General
○ 837/1057 participants had no episodes of MDD in the past year
○ In 12 pairs both members had MDD in the past year
○ Of the 208 with MDD in the past year 62% was female
○ Paths were estimated using statistical software (best fit model)
○ Three levels of analysis on sex differences in individual paths, all outflow paths
from risk variables, total effect of risk variables on liability to MDD
● Individual paths
○ Some individual paths had strong sex differences
○ Stronger in males
■ Childhood sexual abuse to conduct disorder and early onset anxiety
disorder (0.41 vs 0.12)
■ Drug use disorders to distal and dependent proximal stressful life events
(0.16 vs 0)
■ Dependent proximal life events to past year MDD (0.37 vs 0.24)
○ Stronger in females
■ Low parental warmth to early onset anxiety disorders and prior history of
MDD (0.07 vs 0)
■ Low marital satisfaction and social support to past year MDD (0.20 vs 0)
● Risk factors → outflow
○ Low parental warmth, parental loss, lifetime traumas, neuroticism, divorce, social
support, marital satisfaction contribute more strongly to the MDD pathway for
females
○ Low self-esteem, drug use disorder, past history of MDD, distal and dependent
proximal stressful life events contribute more strongly to MDD pathway in
males
● Risk factors → total direct & indirect paths to MDD
○ Compared risk factor severity of sex differences → minimal (<0.02), modest,
moderate, strong sex differences
○ Three variables with modest differences (0.02-0.05)
■ Stronger effect on females (1) → parental warmth
■ Stronger effect on males (2) → childhood sexual abuse & past history of
MDD
○ Four variables with moderate differences (0.05-0.10)
■ Stronger effect on females (2) → neuroticism & divorce
■ Stronger effect on males (2) → conduct disorder & drug use disorder
○ Four variables with strong differences (>0.10)
■ Stronger effect on females (2) → social support & marital satisfaction

, ■ Stronger effect on males (2) → distal & dependent proximal stressful life
events
● Specific classes of stressful life events
○ Three event categories had largest differences in effect size
■ For males most effects → financial problems, work problems, legal
problems
○ For females most effects → relationship problems, serious illnesses in close
social network

Discussion
● Findings of risk factors are consistent with other findings, especially neuroticism
● Support for women being more affected by problems in social network
● Six men risk factors this study found can be divided into 3 (previously established by
research) groups
○ Externalizing psychopathology → drug abuse
○ Prior depressive history → history of MDD
○ Greater sensitivity to specific stressors → childhood sexual abuse, stressful
life events
● Men more likely to be more emotionally involved in occupational & financial
success
● Some findings not consistent with prior research (eg divorce more effects on women)
● These findings not directly comparable to previous studies → complex model
● Findings are congruent with psychoanalytic model by Blatt → cognitive-behavioral,
attachment & interpersonal personal perspective
○ MDD has two forms → anaclictic (deficiencies in caring relationships & unmet
dependency needs) & introjective (inability to meet internal demands for
self-worth & achievement)
○ Males more likely to suffer from introjective & females more likely to suffer from
anaclictic
● Limitations
○ Assumption of causal relationships between predictors & dependent variables
(these variables could have all different types of relationships, probably
reciprocal)
○ Some risk factors were assessed using long term memory and may have been
influenced by recall bias
○ Assumption that multiple independent variables act additively & linearly in
their impact on risk for MDD → unlikely to be true
○ Sample was limited to adult white twins from Virginia

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lindej03. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.75
  • (0)
  Add to cart