100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Applied Methods and Statistics - Summary, Tilburg (8.0) $6.13   Add to cart

Summary

Applied Methods and Statistics - Summary, Tilburg (8.0)

 25 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A summary of the course Applied Methods and Statistics. The summary consists of the lectures given. If you have any questions, you can message me :)

Preview 4 out of 47  pages

  • March 12, 2024
  • 47
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Lecture 1
Introduction
Preliminaries
 We mainly use data obtained from correlation studies.
 Research can be exploratory (let the data speak) or confirmatory (replication studies)
o Always involves studying relationships between variables, but kind/type of variable
differ
 Some are directly measurable/observable = manifest variables
 Some are not directly observable, but measured with dedicated instruments
= latent variables

Path models: A first introduction
Path model = a hypothesis about underlying causal processes that explain the observed correlations
between two or more variables

When variables are associated, it does not mean that there is a causal relationship; there may also be
a common cause  spurious effect.

The goals of a path analysis is to explain why variables correlate.

Investigation of explanatory mechanisms
 It is useful to know that variables correlate, for example to predict risks or to take preventive
measures. But more interesting is the question: why do the variables correlate? And in
particular to distinguish sham effects from real effects
 Important for theory development, and for the development of effective interventions




Important goal of causal analyzes is to rule out spurious effects.

Global roadmap
1. First introduction – basic concepts and basic elements of path models. Specifically, causal
versus non-causal relationships (spurious relationships)
2. Drawing up path models based on theory and vice versa: deducing the underlying hypotheses
for a path model
3. Methods for estimating the models
4. Types of path models: recursive vs. non-recursive, saturated vs. non-saturated
5. Interpreting path models technically and substantively
6. Methods for assessing the fit of the model to the data
7. Applications within psychological research; how do you assess the quality of the study

,Some basic concepts
Correlational vs. experimental
 Experimental = active manipulation of the IVs and random assignment to experimental
conditions.
 Correlational = studying coherence between variables obtained from surveys, field
observations. No manipulation has taken place as in (quasi)-experimental research

Variables = properties of research units you are interested in and in which the research units vary
 If there is no variation in the variable, then you speak of a constant.
o Notice that whether a property is a variable depends on the specific research
population envisaged
 Common mistakes: confusing the values of the variable with the variable itself
o E.g. rich an poor are two values of the same variable income

Basic descriptive statistics
 Mean
 Variance – measure of dispersion, always positive
 Standard deviation – measure of dispersion
 Covariance – measure of linear association
o Covariance > 0 = positive association
o Covariance < 0 = negative association
 Correlation – standardized measure of linear correlation
 Standardized scores
o Z-scores
 Mean = 0
 SD = 1
 Variance = 1

Hypotheses = statements about the supposed relationship between two (or more) variables.
 Can be causal or correlational




Five fundamental relations
Building blocks of path model
 Each path model can be broken down into fundamental relations
o These basic relationships provide possible explanations for the observed
covariance/correlation between variables
o Thus, these fundamental relationships serve as building blocks for path model
 Five fundamental relations:
o Direct effect
o Indirect effect
o Spurious relation
o Unknown effect
o Reciprocal effect

,Direct causal effect
 Hypothesis – changes in X causes changes in Y
 The reverse does not hold
o A change on Y does not affect X
 According to this hypothesis, X is the cause and Y is the effect

Indirect effect
 Causal hypothesis – a change in X directly causes a change in M, a
change in M directly causes a change in Y
 Result: a change in X causes a change in Y, but this effects flows indirect through M. So,
variable X has an indirect effect on Y
 Variable M = mediator, mediates the relationship between X and Y
o Also called the intervening variable

Spurious relation
 We assume a direct effect of Z on X, and a direct effect of Z on Y  variable Z is a
common cause for both X and Y
 Because both X and Y have the same common cause, there is an association
between the two variables. But a change in X has no effect on Y, nor vice versa.
So, it looks as if one affects the other, but it is not true  spurious relation
between X and Y
 Variable Z = confounder
 Correlational research is often aimed at detecting or excluding possible confounders
 Societal perspective
o When two variables correlate, there may be causal effect (direct or indirect), but not
necessarily
o You can never rule out 100% that there is a common cause, so you can never prove
causality when using correlational data. But we can try to exclude common causes as
much as possible. The better that succeeds, the stronger our theory
o But also make sure that variables are not (mis)used as an ‘excuse confounder’

A good understanding of, and an eye for, spurious relationships is essential. Not only within this
course but should be a second nature of academics. Why?
 Our brains are made to see associations; we must be able to filter what are false associations
and what are real associations. This requires substantive knowledge and methodological
attitude.
 Conflating spurious effect for causal effects an have a major social impact.
 With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), which can be used to derive complex patterns
from large data files, this question is even more important.
o Prediction vs explanation

The unknown effect
 There is an association between X1 and X2, but we have no theoretical
explanation about the direction of the relationship, could be direct, indirect,
reciprocal….
 Unknown (or unspecified) effects are represented by a curved double arrow
 The double arrow indicates that we expect a correlation, but we don’t know why (=
unknown)
 Double arrows can be read as “there is a correlation”

, Reciprocal effect
 A change in X1 causes a change in X2, which in turn causes a change in X1,
which in turn causes X2, etc.
 These types of relationships are often used to investigate differences in traits (general
tendency) and states (temporary state)
 Very complex relationships to explore. Require (usually) longitudinal data. Is outside scope of
this course.

Summary




Lecture 2
Path model = hypothesis about underlying causal processes that explain the observed correlations
between two or more variables

Path analysis goal = empirically investigate whether causal hypotheses about underlying psychological
processes are supported by the data  theory construction and validation  applied psychology.

Constructing Path Models
How do we translate a theory into a corresponding path model?
1. List the variables
2. Describe the causal hypotheses between these variables
3. Draw the relationships in a conceptual model
4. A) identify the endogenous variables
B) add disturbance terms to the endogenous variable and draw the correlations between the
exogenous variables
5. Check whether necessary extensions are required  apply the ‘golden rule’

Within causal models we distinguish between exogenous and endogenous variables
 Exogenous = variable only acts as predictor within the model. It is not explained by other
variables in the model.
o There is no arrow pointing to it
 Endogenous = variable is explained by other variables in the model. At least one arrow points
to it. The variable can also itself be a predictor for another variable in the model.

Disturbance terms (unexplained variance)
 Not all possible predictors (= causes) are always included in the model.
 With every endogenous variable there is residual part; unexplained variance

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sabinevandenbrom. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.13. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80562 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.13  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart