100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
A-Level Pearson Edexcel Level 3GCE In Statistics (9ST0/02) 2024 Paper 02: Statistical Inference Summer Exam Paper (AUTHENTIC MAKING SCHEME)$9.49
Add to cart
, Answer ALL questions. Write your answers in the spaces provided.
1 The breaking strength of cables has usually been assessed by testing samples of cables
until they break (testing to destruction).
A manufacturer of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) cables wants to replace
testing to destruction with a method for predicting breaking strength based on known
characteristics of a cable.
The methods to be compared are a computer simulation model and a
mathematical model.
The investigation involves selecting a sample of 18 CFRP cables. Nine of them have
their breaking strengths predicted by a computer simulation model and nine by a
mathematical model.
Each cable is then tested to destruction to determine its actual breaking strength.
The following are the percentage errors made in the predictions for each model.
A negative error means that the prediction is too low.
Previous research suggests that percentage errors such as these have skew distributions.
(a) Perform a non-parametric test to decide whether there is evidence of a difference in
the average prediction error of these models.
(9)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
3
*P69433A0320* Turn over
, Question 1 continued
Khalid, a junior researcher, instead suggested evaluating the methods by comparing
mean percentage error using a t-test.
(b) Make two comments on the suitability of this suggestion.
(2)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Lauren, the chief engineer, suggests that, to make the comparison, it would have been
better to run both the computer and mathematical models using the same cables, and
then testing each to destruction.
(c) State, with justification, whether or not you agree with Lauren’s suggestion.
(2)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(d) Suggest a test that Lauren could use to compare the two methods.
(2)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(Total for Question 1 is 15 marks)
4
*P69433A0420*
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller RevisionKing. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
