100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Public Law - Procedural impropriety: duty to act fairly revision notes (semester 2) $3.97   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Public Law - Procedural impropriety: duty to act fairly revision notes (semester 2)

 12 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Documents containing all the relevant information about the topic, condensed into colour coded tables to enable easier memorisation and order. I achieved a first class in public law using these notes.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • January 14, 2024
  • 4
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Procedural Impropriety – duty to act fairly/natural justice


“Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when…one can conveniently classify
under three heads the grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by
judicial review.
• The first ground I would call ‘illegality,’
• the second ‘irrationality’ and
• the third "procedural impropriety.’”

(Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case)

PROCEDURAL IMPROPRIETY – DUTY TO ACT FAIRLY

ISSUE: The issue in this scenario is under the ground of what Diplock in the GCHQ case
called, ‘procedural impropriety’ and more specifically this engages with duty to act fairly.

ARTICULATE LEGAL TEST Decision makers must act fairly by adopting fair procedures
and following the rules of ‘natural justice’

AUTHORITY FOR TEST Bourgass

WAYS TO ACT FAIRLY  Give notice (but how much detail?) – telling someone
you’re making a decision
 Written representations – for the decision maker to be
invited and accept
 An oral hearing – people get together and present
their side of their story and their facts
 Cross examination of witnesses
 Legal representation

As you go down the list your participation increases

WHY REQUIRE Improving decision making (instrumental value)
FAIRNESS???  Adopting fair procedures leads to good decision
making
 this is an indirect way of improving outcomes as the
courts are reluctant to intervene so if the decision
process is already good they don’t have to

ethical value
 state interaction with citizens
 state treats people appropriately as an individual with
respect as it would be disrespectful to make decisions
about people without letting them have a say

WHEN IS FAIRNESS Rather than asking what does fairness require they asked
REQUIRED??? when is fairness required

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaalunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83100 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.97
  • (0)
  Add to cart