Other
Criminal Law Crib Sheet
- Course
- Institution
Concise set of revision notes covering all key details and case authorities from the BPP PGDL Criminal Law module.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
giorgia7
Content preview
CRIMINAL LAW CRYPT SHEETIntroduction to the criminal justice system
Defendant = “innocent until proven guilty”+ entitled to fair trial
Classification
Summary For LESS SERIOUS crimes – e.g. assault, criminal damage subject to
only the value of damage caused
ONLY tried in Magistrates Courts
Maximum of a £5k fine and/or 6 months’ imprisonment (or up to 12
months’ for 2 or more offenses running consecutively)
Indictable Murder, manslaughter, robbery, GBH with intent
only Maximum penalty as set out in the statute
‘Either way’ Capable of being tried on indictment
Examples: theft, assault occasioning bodily harm
A crime is a ‘public wrong’
© Aims of sentencing: punishing & reforming offenders, reducing crime + protecting the
public
© Morality can inform the legislature, but not all immoral behaviour is criminalised (e.g.
extra-marital sex)
© Criminal law is constantly EVOLVING – case law + changing attitudes in society
© Civil vs criminal
o Civil claims are about private matters damages and/or injunction
o Criminal claims are about the prevention of harm to protect the public prison
and/or fine
Burden of proof = on the PROSECUTION
Standard of proof = beyond reasonable doubt (Woolmington v DPP)
N.B. For defences, standard of proof = balance of probabilities + burden on defendant
,Topic (1) Core Principles of criminal liability
Criminal liability = actus reus + mens rea + absence of a valid defence
Actus reus (guilty action)
FOUR different categories of offences (a crime can fit into more than one):
1. Conduct Acts must have been committed by D to satisfy actus reus
Example: blackmail (s 21 Theft Act 1968) – not necessary that the
victim gives into the demand or that anything happens as a result, only
that the D makes a demand with menaces
2. Result Action must lead to a specified consequence
Example: murder – actions of D must cause the death of V
3. Circumstances Particular surrounding circumstances is needed
Example: theft (s 1(1) Theft Act 1968) – must appropriate property
‘belonging to another’
4. Omissions While general rule = that there is NO liability to act, in certain
circumstances there may be a legal obligation to act
Example: an on-duty lifeguard could be liable for gross negligence
manslaughter if a swimmer drowns because they fail to intervene
Examples: actus reus
s 1(1) Criminal Damage Act 1971 - damage/destruction + property + belonging to another
+ without lawful excuse
s 1(1) Theft Act 1968 - appropriation + property + belonging to another
Result crimes
Result crimes require that the defendant’s conduct CAUSE a particular result (e.g. murder,
manslaughter, criminal damage & assault occasioning actual bodily harm)
Result crimes = Factual causation + legal causation + absence of NAI
Factual Causation: 'BUT FOR' test - 'but for' the acts or omissions of the accused, the
relevant consequence would not have occurred in the way that it did (R v White)
- N.B. Any action which accelerates death IS a cause (R v Dyson)
Legal Causation: checking the CULPABILITY of the defendant
© D is ‘operating and substantial cause’ of the prohibited consequence (R v Pagett)
o D’s act must be 'substantial' cause = more than minimal (R v Hughes)
o Consequence must be caused BY the defendant's culpable act (R v Dalloway)
o D’s act need NOT be the only cause of the prohibited consequence (R v Benge)
, Use common sense if a new situation
arises! (R v Girdler)
Absence of NAI
Medical negligence Acts of third party Acts of victim Thin skull rule Natural events
1. Medical Courts RELUCTANT to allow medical malpractice to break chain:
negligence 2nd cause must be ‘so overwhelming (R v Smith)
Negligent treatment must be ‘so independent’ and ‘itself so potent in
causing death’ that D’s acts are ‘insignificant’ (R v Cheshire)
2. Acts of Actions of third party will only break the chain of causation if they were
third party ‘free, deliberate and informed’ (R v Pagett)
3. Acts of i) Fright and flight – was V’s actions ‘so daft and unexpected that no
victim reasonable person could have foreseen it’? (R v Roberts)
© Jury has same knowledge D had when they committed act (Roberts)
© Characteristics of victim = that which would be visible to a
reasonable man present at the time of D’s act (Williams and Davies)
ii) Refusing medical treatment
© R v Blaue - must take V as they find them both in mind & in body
(refusal to have a blood transfusion due to religious beliefs)
© R v Holland - does not matter whether wound was instantly mortal, or
cause of death was because V refused recommended treatment
© R v Dear - irrelevant whether V deliberately caused
resumption/continuation of bleeding as D’s conduct continues to be
an operative & significant contribution to death
iii) Suicide – whether a victim’s suicide has been caused BY the defendant =
question of fact that juries should apply their common sense to (R v Wallace)
May NOT break chain where:
V nonetheless dies from the original wound (R v Dear)
Act was reasonably foreseeable (applying the rule in R v Roberts and R v
Williams and Davies)
D’s unlawful act = a significant & operating cause of death + at time of
attack suicide because of injuries = reasonably foreseeable (R v Wallace)
MAY break chain where:
injuries inflicted by D have healed, but V goes on to die by suicide
(distinguishing R v Dear)
Voluntary and informed decision of V to act (R v Kennedy – a person
who supplies a drug to another has NOT caused that drug to be
administered when the other injects it)
4. Thin skull Defendant MUST take the victim as they find them (R v Hayward)
rule
5. Natural Will ONLY break the chain of causation if they are ‘extraordinary’ and NOT
events reasonably foreseeable
Omissions
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller giorgia7. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $24.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79064 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now