Cases for Obligations CHAPTER 4.
EXTINGUISHMENT OF OBLIGATIONS;
LOSS OR IMPOSSIBILITY
OCCEÑA VS. COURT OF APPEALS – ANSWER Petitioners who are landowners had
a subdivision contract with Tropical Homes Inc, for the development of their land.
Tropical Homes filed a complaint for modification of the terms and conditions of their
contract, alleging that due to the increase in the price of oil and its derivatives and the
concomitant worldwide spiralling of prices of all commodities including basic raw
materials for the development work, the cost of development has risen to levels which
are unanticipated, unimagined, and not within the remotest contemplation of the parties
at the time the agreement was made, such that the conditions and factors which formed
the original basis of the contract have been totally changed.
Tropical Homes Inc.'s complaint for modification of contract cannot be granted. Art.
1267 - When the service has become so difficult as to be manifestly beyond the
contemplation of the parties, the obligor may also be released therefrom, in whole or in
part.
Such cannot be granted for it is not provided for by Art 1267. Performance is not
excused by the fact that the contract turns out to be hard and improvident, unprofitable
or impracticable, ill-advised or even foolish, or less profitable, or unexpectedly
burdensome, since in case a part desires to be excused from performance in the event
of such contingencies arising, it is his duty to provide therefore in the contract.
NAGA TELEPHONE CO. V CA - ANSWERThe parties entered into a contract for the
use by NATELCO of CASURECO's electric light posts in Naga City. In consideration,
petitioners agreed to install, free of charge, 10 telephone connections for the use by
CASURECO. "That the term or period of this contract shall be as long as NATELCO has
need for the electric light posts of the party of CASURECO it being understood that this
contract shall be terminated when for any reason whatsoever, CASURECO is forced to
stop, abandon its operation as a public service and it becomes necessary to remove the
electric lightpost." CASURECO filed a petition for reformation of contract with the RTC
of Naga City on the ground that the agreement it entered into with NATELCO has
become one-sided, inequitous and disadvantageous to the former. The trial court ruled
in favor of CASURECO. The CA affirmed the trial court's decision but on a different
legal basis—Article 1267 of the Civil Code and ruling that the contract contains a purely
potestative prestation making that stipulation void. The Court affirmed the decision of
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller DESTINYGRACE. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $16.19. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.