100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Comlaw 201 exam questions with correct answers $14.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Comlaw 201 exam questions with correct answers

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Exam of 4 pages for the course pncc at pncc (Comlaw 201 exam)

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • November 20, 2023
  • 4
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Comlaw 201




Harvey v Facey - ANSWERJust providing info is not an offer
-The seller (Facey) was just providing information when he said the lowest price is 900
pounds, it was not an offer. So there was no agreement when Harvey accepted the
'offer' (which was just providing info, not an offer).

O'Keefe v Lee Calan Imports - ANSWERJust advertising the product and price on its
own is not an offer.
-Price of the car should have been higher ($1795) but the ad mistakenly listed it at a
lower price ($1095) and Lee Calan Imports was not obliged to sell at the lower price as
it was not an offer.

Fisher v Bell - ANSWERGoods displayed on the shelf with a price tag are merely an
invitation to treat by the seller, not an offer.

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company - ANSWERAn offer may be made through an
advertisement (i.e. to the world at large) if the offerors intention to be bound is clear.
Unilateral contract: Once Carlill did what was needed to be done she didn't have to do
anything else as the contract was already made.

Felthouse v Bindley - ANSWERAn offeror cannot impose silence as a means of
acceptance so to enforce a contract against someone

Dickinson v Dodds - ANSWERAn offer may be withdrawn before acceptance without
any formal notice to the offeree if the offeree has knowledge that the person who made
the offer has done something inconsistent with the continuance of the offer. BUT that
knowledge must be first hand via a reliable source (if not then the offeree will be entitled
to damages). Revocation can be communicated by a reliable third party.

Sommerville v Rice - ANSWERRevocation must be communicated for it to be effective
and should be communicated before the offer is accepted. Postal rule does not apply to
revocation.
-Landlord made an offer of lease
-Tenant posted letter of acceptance (postal rule applies)
-Then, before the letter of acceptance reached the landlord, the tenant posted a letter of
revocation (postal rule does not apply)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller DESTINYGRACE. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82871 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart