100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
SOCI 301 Class Notes $8.39   Add to cart

Class notes

SOCI 301 Class Notes

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Full semester worth of class notes including some pop up quizes that were given to us in class. Soci 301: Sociology of Development and Underdevelopment.

Preview 4 out of 35  pages

  • November 7, 2023
  • 35
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • N/a
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Sociology of Development & Underdevelopment


WEEK 2A: Development Reality and Theory

Origins of Development
1. Colonialism: environmental and social costs. The ends justify the means
a. Europe put itself as the benchmark
b. Goal: extract resources (pull out and not put in ) + look more westernize
i. Exp: jamaica largest production of __ Development as a social process

2. Development as a social process
a. Social Cost: cultural shifts, community/ relationship changes

3. Development as political intervention
a. Government involvement, multinational institutions like the UN
4. Philosophically: Improving humankind interpreted as socially engineering societies
(capitalism and industrialization)
5. Imperialist intervention (resource extraction, social transformation… racism constitute
the white man’s burden)

Problems with Development
● Development originated with colonization
○ European accomplishment compared to other societies and understood as
dominant and superior
○ Came with substantial environmental problems and social upheavals
● All about the future not about improving the past
○ Exp: reduce the ecological footprint
● The ideal of development ruptured by govt cutback and citizens protests

Development and Social Engineering 19th century :
● Associated with ‘white man’s burden’
○ Changes in language, religion …
● Social engineering: policy for social transformation (capitalism, industrialization,
regulation, colonization, and imperialism )
● Social engineering in colonies: new discipline (forced labor, schooling, segregation )
● Development introduced new class, racial hierarchies in colonized societies as well as
within colonizing societies

Social Engineering in the 20th century
● Development as a ‘project’
○ Decolonization and anti-colonial resistance made development an emancipatory
promise
○ 1945: UN

, ○ Civilizing project: the ideology of nationalism
○ 21st century: development defined by economic growth and rising consumption
● Goal: political independence for self-determination

Development as Projects
1. Development project : (the 1940s-1980): rooted in public regulation of markets as
servants of states; governments protect civil rights through a social contract =
commodity chain
2. Globalization project : (1980 --) markets regain ascendancy; incorporation of the ‘good
market, bad state’ mantra int public discourse
3. Sustainability project : (2000 --), tension between these poles continue as the world
transitions to a new project governed by ‘climate regime”
Example:
● ​Evidence of a Development paradox, where poverty accompanies economic growth
○ Control of 50 percent of world income by the wealthiest 10 percent
○ High levels of malnutrition in India in spite of economic growth
○ The dynamic that links these projects, and accounts for their succession is a series of Polany
mobilization)

● Ghost acres

DO JOURNAL REFLECTION

Development Theory
● Influenced by Adam Smith’s Wealth hof Nations (neoclassical economic theory)
○ Division of labor
○ Free Market
○ Productivity
● Economic principle: markets maximize individual preferences and allocate resources
efficiently
● Development is about output income and consumption
● Ricardp : specialization is good or countries
● Main development theories approach this economic question in different ways


1. Mo

( finish slides*** )




Week 2B: Development Theories

,Modernization Theory

The rise of Modernization Theory
1. USA rise as a superpower: via the Marshall plan and support to weakened European
countries
2. Spread of communism
3. The disintegration of European colonial powers and the birth of new nation-states in the
Third World seeking models of development for their countries

● Modernization Theory: differences between traditional vs. modern societies: So-called
modern societies (North American, European) have increased function capacities
because of social structural differentiation compared to traditional societies
○ Development, as a project, has its origin in the colonial era because European
dominant

Features of modernization theory
● Phased process (eg. economic stages of development)
● Homogenizing process (convergence)
○ Europeanization or americanization process
● Irreversible
● It is inevitable and desirable
● Lengthy process ( evolutionary, not revolutionary)
○ Modernization is systematic
○ transformative: traditional structures replaced
○ Imminent process due to systematic and transformative features

Rostow: Modernization Perspective
● The celebrated Western model of free enterprise
● Evolutionary sequence or ‘stages’ traverse a linear sequence:
1. Traditional Society: agrarian limited productivity
2. Preconditions for Take-off: state formation, education, science, banking,
profit-systematization
3. Take-off: normalization of growth, with investment rates promoting the expanded
reproduction of industry
4. Maturity: the second industrial revolution: from textiles and iron to machine tools,
chemicals and electrical equipment
5. Age of High Mass- Consumption: from basic to durable, good, urbanization and
rising level of white-collar vs. blue-collar work

Strengths of Modernization Theory:
● It has broad appeal in many disciplines and can inform research focus
● Provides clear analytical focus: traditional or modern
● Provides methodology focus: via concepts such as values, democratic principles

, Weakness of Modernization Theory:
● Treats countries as autonomous units isolated from global forces
● Assumes development is unidirectional
● Ignores multiple paths to economic growth eg. Taiwan has strong authoritarian regimes
● Requires elimination of traditional values, which are treated as homogeneous
● Traditional and modern values are not always mutually exclusive
● Model assumes development is all good
● It does not account for de-industrialization, which is taking place in many developed
societies

Dependency Theory (DT)
● Dependency: the unequal economic relations between metropolitan societies and
non-European peripheries account for the development of the former at the expense of
‘underdevelopment of the latter
● Dependency: the vulnerable state of being exploited by core countries
○ Depend on the core for trade, investment, loans, technology etc
● DT argues that trade is asymmetrical :
○ Poor countries are dependent on rich ones
■ They need manufactured goods and are forced to pay high prices
■ Must sell their raw materials and agricultural products very cheaply
● However, ‘dependency’ implies a ‘development- centrism’ where western development is
the term of reference
● Exp: France was interested in the nation-state and colonial countries
○ Creating a DEPENDENT relationship with the foriegn countries = dependent on
foriegn resources
○ Third-world countries need to break the relationship to DEVELOP INTERNALLY

The Development of Underdevelopment = Gunder Frant
1. The development of national and other subordinate metropoles is limited by their satellite
status ( exp: despite how big Lagos is it is still a satellite= limit how far it can develop)
a. Still being exploited by the external force
2. Satellites experience their greatest economic development when their ties to metropoles
are weakest
3. Regions with the most underdevelopment today had close ties to metropoles in the past
4. Latifundia ( plantations) were born as commercial enterprises to respond to demands in
national and global markets
a. Exp: Sugarcane industry wasn’t developed until met the global demand
5. Today’s subsistence-based and isolated latifundia are due to a decline in demands for
their exports
a. Exp: the competitive market for Bananas in Caribbean countries with Latin A
countries

Weakness of Dependency Theory

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller areenashrestha. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart