A summary of all the problems and case law of this course. All sorted by topic by topic and a short summary (of the summary haha) at the end of the summary. Everything you need to know! I had an 8:)
The summary is very clear and helps you understand the legislation and case law. The contact was also very fast and pleasant! I would recommend this one.
By: renée3 • 7 months ago
Seller
Follow
FFstuv
Reviews received
Content preview
TENTAMEN EUROPEAN LAW: JHA
PROBLEM 1A – SCHENGEN......................................................................................................................................... 4
The Schengen Area.............................................................................................................................................................4
Border checks for persons entering the Schengen Area (EXTERNAL).................................................................................4
Checks within the Schengen Member States (INTERNAL)..................................................................................................5
Case C-278/12 PPU Atiqullah Adil..................................................................................................................................5
Schengen rules regarding the reintroduction of border controls/closing the borders.......................................................6
SHORT SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................................8
PROBLEM 1B – FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS........................................................................................................... 8
Rights of EU citizens and their family members regarding movement and residence in another MS...............................9
Rights of TCN’s and their family members regarding movement and residence in another MS.....................................10
Losing right to residence for EU citizens and family members........................................................................................11
Case C-145/09 Land Baden-Württemberg v Panagiotis Tsakouridis............................................................................11
Case C-348/09 P.I. v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (P.I.)........................................................................12
Family reunification for TCN’s under EU law....................................................................................................................12
How far reaching is the fundamental status of EU citizenship?......................................................................................13
Case C-34/09 Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) (Zambrano).........................................13
Case C-836/18 Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v. RH (Gabierno)...........................................................15
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................15
PROBLEM 2A............................................................................................................................................................ 17
Criteria for refugee...........................................................................................................................................................17
Joined cases C-199/12 and C-201/12 Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v. X. Y.Z......................................................19
Joined cases C-71/11 and C-99/11 Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Y and Z................................................................19
Criteria for subsidiary protection.....................................................................................................................................20
Case C-465/07 Meki Elgafaji and Noor Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie............................................................21
Case C-901/19 CF and DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland..........................................................................................22
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................22
PROBLEM 2B............................................................................................................................................................ 23
Common rules on reception/living conditions for refugees and migrants.......................................................................23
Common rules for asylum procedures..............................................................................................................................23
Responsible Member State...............................................................................................................................................24
Case C-648/11, MA, BT, DA v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:93...................25
Not transferring under Dublin III due Human Rights Violations......................................................................................26
M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece App no. 30696/09 (ECtHR, 21 January 2011), focus on paras. 9-30 and 335-359 of the
judgment......................................................................................................................................................................26
Joined cases C-411/10 and C-493/10, N.S v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, and M.E, A.S.M, M.T, K.P
and E.H v. Refugee Applications Commissioner, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2011]
ECLI:EU:C:2011:865......................................................................................................................................................26
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................27
PROBLEM 3A............................................................................................................................................................ 28
1
, The European Arrest Warrant..........................................................................................................................................28
Case C-303/05 Advocaten voor de Wereld v. Leden van de Ministerraad [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:261......................30
Refusion of the execution of a European Arrest Warrant................................................................................................30
Case C-42/11 Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012: 517...............................................................31
PROBLEM 3B............................................................................................................................................................ 31
Fundamental rights in the EAW.......................................................................................................................................31
Refusing of an EAW on human rights grounds................................................................................................................32
Case C-396/11 Ministrul Public – Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de Apel Constanta v Ciprian Vasile Radu. – regarding
trials in absentia (Radu)................................................................................................................................................32
Case C-399/11 Stefano Melloni v. Ministerio Fiscal.....................................................................................................33
Case: Aranyosi and Caldararu.......................................................................................................................................33
Case C-216/18 PPU Minister for Justice and Equality v LM.........................................................................................34
SHORT SUMMARY 3A & 3B!.............................................................................................................................................35
PROBLEM 4A............................................................................................................................................................ 36
EU legal framework on data protection...........................................................................................................................36
When and to whom do EU data rules apply?...................................................................................................................36
Principles of data protection............................................................................................................................................37
Data protection rights for individuals..............................................................................................................................37
Case law: Google v. Spain.............................................................................................................................................37
Transferring personal data to third countries..................................................................................................................38
Case law: Schrems I......................................................................................................................................................38
Case law: Schrems II.....................................................................................................................................................38
Rules for collecting and processing personal data for criminal justice purposes............................................................39
Case law: Digital Rights Ireland v. Ireland....................................................................................................................39
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................40
PROBLEM 4B............................................................................................................................................................ 41
Europol.............................................................................................................................................................................41
Difference, similarities, and cooperation between Europol and Eurojust........................................................................42
Consequences of Eurojust and Europol being established through intergovernmental cooperation.............................43
Frontex.............................................................................................................................................................................43
LECTURES................................................................................................................................................................. 45
Lecture 1 – The EU & Area of freedom, security, and justice...........................................................................................45
Lecture 2 – Understanding the functioning of the AFSJ (I)...............................................................................................49
Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk..............................................................................................................................................50
Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen.......................................................................................................................................50
Case C-85/96 Martinez Sala.........................................................................................................................................50
Case C-333/13 Dano.....................................................................................................................................................50
Case C-256/11 Dereci...................................................................................................................................................51
Case Coman..................................................................................................................................................................51
Case C-508/10 Commission v. Netherlands.................................................................................................................51
Lecture 3 – Understanding the functioning of the AFSJ (II)..............................................................................................52
Joined Cases C-643.15 and C-647/15 Slovak Republic and Hungary v. Council...........................................................54
Joined Cases C-715/17, C-718/17 and C-719/17 Commission v Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic................54
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller FFstuv. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.08. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
