Exam (elaborations)
PLS2601 EXAM PACK 2023 FOR ANY QUERIES & EXAM HELP CONTACT: biwottcornelius@gmail.com
- Course
- Institution
PLS2601 EXAM PACK 2023 FOR ANY QUERIES & EXAM HELP CONTACT:
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Solutionist
Reviews received
Content preview
PLS2601EXAM
PACK 2023
FOR ANY QUERIES & EXAM HELP CONTACT:
biwottcornelius@gmail.com
, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace
PLS2601
Jan/Feb 2021
QUESTION 1: SHORT QUESTIONS:
Instructions for Question 1:
Write short answers for each question.
1.1. Define the “ad hominem fallacy”.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ (2)
1.2. What is a “bandwagon argument”?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ (2)
1.3. What is a “stipulative definition”?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ (2)
1.4. Define “argumentative writing”:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ (2)
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 2 of 8
Downloaded by: xoliswamdlamini | xoliswamdlamini@gmail.com
Distribution of this document is illegal
, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace
PLS2601
Jan/Feb 2021
1.5. Explain the difference between “explanatory writing” and “instructive writing”:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ (4)
1.6. Using the following table, compare the “modus ponens” and “modus tollens” arguments:
Modus Ponens: Modus Tollens:
(4)
1.7 Consider the following text from the former US President Ronald Reagan’s 1961 speech
concerning “socialized medicine”:
“Once you establish the precedent that the government can determine a
man’s working place and his working methods, determine his employment,
from here it's a short step to all the rest of socialism -- to determining his
pay, and pretty soon your son won’t decide when he’s in school, where he
will go, or what they will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell
him where he will go to work and what he will do”
(https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ronaldreagansocializedmedi
cine.htm).
(a) Identify the fallacy evident in this text:
______________________________________________________________________ (2)
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 3 of 8
Downloaded by: xoliswamdlamini | xoliswamdlamini@gmail.com
Distribution of this document is illegal
, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace
PLS2601
Jan/Feb 2021
(b) Provide a definition for the fallacy identified in (a) above.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ (2)
[20]
QUESTION 2: ARGUMENT EVALUATION:
Instructions for Question 2:
1. Evaluate the following arguments.
2. In your evaluation, state whether the argument is inductive or deductive, value or empirical, contains
a fallacy or not (stipulate which fallacy if it contains one) and whether it is valid/invalid or
sound/unsound.
3. Present your responses to all of the arguments in the form of the table below:
Argument 1:
P1: If Donald Trump is still named as President of the United States on his Twitter account,
then he must still be the American President.
P2: Donald Trump is not still named as President of the United States on his Twitter account.
C: Therefore, Donald Trump is not still the American President.
Argument 2:
P1: Bird watchers argue that this riverside area should not be developed because there is a
rare sort of bird in the vicinity, whose habitat could be destroyed.
P2: But building homes on this land would provide for new jobs.
P3: So many people’s lives have been impacted economically by the pandemic.
C: Hence, I don’t think that the bird people have an argument against development.
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 4 of 8
Downloaded by: xoliswamdlamini | xoliswamdlamini@gmail.com
Distribution of this document is illegal
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Solutionist. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
83637 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now