Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided as is without any representations or
warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This
document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced,
resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
Question 1
Complete
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
Match the following statement with the corresponding case. Courts, Parliament and the executive would do
well to treat African customary law, traditions and institutions not as an inconvenience to be tolerated but as
a heritage to be nurtured and preserved for posterity, particularly in view of the many years of distortion and
abuse under the Apartheid regime...But courts ought not to be dismissive of these institutions when they
insist on the observance of traditional governance protocols and conventions on the basis of whatever
limitations they might impose on constitutional rights.
, a.
Ngwenyama v Mayelane 2012(10)BCLR1071(SCA)
b.
Fanti v Boto and Others 2008 (5) SA 404 (C)
c.
Pilane and Another v Pilane and others 2013(4) BCLR 431 (CC)
d.
Mayelane v Ngwenyama and another 2013(8) BCLR 918 (CC)
Question 2
Complete
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
Match the following statement with the corresponding case.
First, whereas the Valoyi people moved away from any previously existing rule that a woman could never
be a Hosi, other aspects of the customs and traditions governing chieftainship are not necessarily 16
affected. For example, to the extent that the principle that a Hosi is born and not elected indeed exists, it is
not necessarily changed by this ruling.
a.
Bhe v Magistrate Khayelisha and Others 2005 (1) BCLR (1) (CC)
b.
Mabuza v Mbatha 2003 (7) BCLR 43 (C) Mabuza v Mbatha 2003 (7) BCLR 43 (C)
c.
Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa 2009 (3) BCLR 243 (CC)
d.
Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC)
Question 3
Complete
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
Match the following statement with the corresponding case.
I conclude then, that construed in the light of its history and context, section 23 of the Act and its
regulations are manifestly discriminatory and in breach of section 9(3) of our Constitution. The
discrimination they perpetuate touches a raw nerve in most South Africans. It is a relic of our racist and
painful past. This court has on a number of occasions, expressed the need to purge the statute book of
such harmful and hurtful provisions.
a.
Maluleke v Minister of Home Affairs case no. 02/24921[2008]ZAGPHC 129 (9 April... (unreported)
b.
Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa 2009 (3) BCLR 243 (CC)
Guaranteed Distinction!!!
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller drgeeelectronic. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.70. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.