‘Kantian ethics is the most helpful in making moral decisions.’ Discuss.
‘Excluding empathy from moral decision making is wrong’ Discuss.
‘To what extent should moral decisions be guided by the principle of doing ones duty.’ Discuss.
3 essay plans needed for possible questions ...
‘Kantian ethics is the most helpful in making moral decisions.’ Discuss.
Paragraph 1
P -Kant argues that we must perform our duty.
E -Duty is our universal moral code, meaning everyone must follow their duty. Duty must be
performed out of good will, performing the right action for the right reason. Duty cannot be
performed out of self-interest, for example a shopkeeper Who charges customers fairly just because
he figures it is good for business is not performing out of duty. Because duty is universal, all humans
have the same duties which they are able to work out since they are human, these can be worked
out using reason.
R - However, Kants theory of duty relies heavily on the basis that all humans are capable of thinking
rationally to come to a reasonable moral decision. This is not the case as not all humans will be
capable of using their reason to understand their duty, meaning this theory is not good for making
moral decisions.
Paragraph 2
P –Kantian ethics is helpful due to the categorical imperative.
E – One aspect of the categorical imperative is the formula of the end in itself. This formula suggests
that everyone is rational and autonomous meaning that everyone has a duty to treat people as ends
in themselves not as a means to an end. This means that no one should be used for someone's own
benefit. Because of this Kant rules out all forms of human exploitation as it removes the individuals
free will and implies that they are being used for personal benefit.
R - This view can be criticised as it does not regard the situation of the action, making it unhelpful in
practice. There may be a situation where an individual may have to use someone for their own
benefit to survive.
Paragraph 3
P – Kantian ethics is not the most helpful.
E – Bentham would argue that the best way to make a moral decision is by weighing up the amount
of pleasure and pain which is likely to result from the outcome of a particular action in a particular
circumstance. This suggests that the same action performed in two separate circumstances may be
regarded differently in terms of how moral the action was. In the example of stealing, there will be
greater happiness, or pleasure, produce if a loaf of bread is stolen to feed starving children, than if a
pair of shoes are stolen just because you wanted them.
R - Kant argues that the same action should be conducted in the same way, regardless of any
consequences, by everyone partaking in the action.
‘Excluding empathy from moral decision making is wrong’ Discuss.
Paragraph 1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jenniferfields. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.95. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
