100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IB psychology SL: Cognitive approach SAQ $3.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

IB psychology SL: Cognitive approach SAQ

 12 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Compilation of IB Psychology SL Cognitive approach SAQ questions and answers. Answer are written by myself and are used during May 2023 session. Grade received: 6. Question includes: - Multi-store memory - schema theory - reconstructive memory - working memory - flashbulbs memory - think...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • August 3, 2023
  • 7
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Secondary school
  • 1
avatar-seller
IB Psychology
Cognitive Approach SAQ

Discuss One model of Memory (Multi Store memory)
Glanzer and Cunitz
Theory - Presented by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968)
- Assume that memory consists of different locations in which information is stored, and each
has a uniform way of storing
- Memory refers to a process by which information is encoded, stored, and retrieved
- Sensory Memory
- Detect information from the environment, it encodes information by five senses
- Most important are visual store and auditory store
- It holds until it either gets transferred to short term memory or lost if attention is not
given
- Duration is 2-5 seconds
- If attention is given, information will then be transferred to STM
- Short-term memory
- Gateway by which information can gain access to long-term memory
- Capacity of STM assumed to be limited
- Its duration is about 6-18 seconds
- With rehearsal, information may stay in STM up to 30 seconds
- Information in STM can quickly lost if not rehearsed
- Information can be displaced by new information
- With rehearsal and attention given, information then be stored in long-term memory
- Long-term memory (LTM)
- Vast storehouse of information
- Believed to be indefinite duration and potentially unlimited capacity
- This theory is supported by Glanzer and Cunitz (1966)
- Primary effect: tendency to recall the word earlier
- Recency effect: recall most recent information

Aim To examine whether the position of words influences recall (primary and recency effects) and see if
there are two separate stores of memory (STM and LTM)

Procedure - Participants: psychology students in introductory class
- Glanzer and Cunitz presented two groups of participants with the same list of words
- One group recalled the words immediately after the presentation, while the other group
recalled the words after waiting 30 seconds
- These participants had to count backward in threes which prevented rehearsal and caused the
recency effect to disappear.
- Both groups could freely recall the words in any order

Results - Delaying recall by 30 seconds destroys the recency effect, participants only remembered the
first few words = words earlier are rehearsed and moved to LTM due to primary effect but
displaced information in STM, no more recency
- No delay condition= participants can remember first few words and last few words
- Words earlier are moved to LTM as primary effect

, - Words at the last are still in STM as recency effect

Conclusion - MSM is correct
- Showing that LTM and ST are in different stores
- STM can be replaced
- The distractor task reduces recency effects as it interferes with STM



Discuss Reconstructive memory
Loftus and Palmer
Reconstructive - Psychologists argue that episodic memory is not just a photographic snapshot in the brain,
memory Theory but instead it is reconstructed
- Schema theory suggest that memory is based on schema
- When we encode and retrieve episodic memories, we are influenced by our perceptions, past
knowledge and personal beliefs
- Loftus supports Bartlett’s idea of memory as reconstructive
- Loftus claims that the nature of questions asked by police or in a courtroom can influence
witnesses’ memory
- Leading question are suggestive in some way and post-event information facilitate schema
processing which may influence the accuracy of recall → misinformation effect


Aim Investigate whether the use of leading question would affect the estimation of speed

Procedure - Researchers predicted that using the word ‘smashed’ would result in a higher estimation of
speed than using the word ‘hit’
- IV: intensity of the verb used in the critical question
- DV: estimation of speed
- Participants: 45 students
- Divide into 5 groups of nine students
- 7 films of traffic accidents were shown and the length of the films ranged from 5-30 seconds
- These films were taken from driver’s education films
- The study was an independent sample designs
- Each participant watched all 7 films
- When the participants had watched a film they were asked to give an account of the accident
they seen and answered a questionnaire with different questions on the accident
- One question is the critical question where they were asked to estimate the speed of the cars
involved in the accident
- The participants were asked to estimate the speed of the cars involved in the accident
- They were asked the same question but with different words
- Such as the critical words “hit” “collide” “bumped” “smashed” or “contacted”

Results - Mean estimates of speed were highest in “smashed” condition (40.8 mph)
- Lowest in the “contacted” group (31.8 mph)
- The result indicated that the critical word in the question consistently affected the
participants’ answers to the question
- The researcher argued that it may be that the different speed estimates are the result of
response-biassed saan
- The distortion of memory is based on reconstruction so that it is not the actual details of the

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller chloe10. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79879 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart