𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓻𝔂
duration, capacity & coding of memory: research on duration
research on duration
Peterson & Peterson: short term memory
→ asked participants to recall trigrams after 18 seconds without rehearsal
→ 3 secs: 80% accuracy
→ 18 secs: 10% accuracy
→ thus very little can stay in STM without rehearsal
Bahrick: long term memory
→ yearbooks: 300 participants asked to recall students from school through free
recall (list their names), photo recognition (shown photo, give name) & name
recognition (given name, match to photo)
→ after 15 years: free recall 60%, photo recognition 90%
→ after 48 years: free recall 30%, photo recognition 70%
evaluation
- Peterson & Peterson: meaningless stimuli
→ trigrams are meaningless so lacks external validity
+ Bahrick: meaningful stimulo
→ real-life stimuli (yearbooks) thus has high external validity
→ Shepard: better recall than studies with meaningless stimuli
duration, capacity & coding of memory: research on capacity
research on capacity
Jacobs: short term memory
→ participants asked to repeat string of letters & numbers
→ on average remembered around 7 items
→ Jacobs concluded capacity of STM around 5-9 items; increased with age
(potentially due to techniques such as chunking)
, Miller: review of short term memory
→ argued 7 +/- 2 items capacity of STM
→ this can be increased through chunking; can memorise around 7 chunks
evaluation
+ Jacobs’ study is valid
→ Bopp & Verhaeghen: replicated findings so valid test of digit span
- Miller overestimated chunking capacity
→ Coward: only 4 chunks can be stored in STM
duration, capacity & coding of memory: research on coding
research on coding
Baddeley: short & long term memory
→ participants were given 4 sets of words either acoustically similar, acoustically
dissimilar, semantically similar or semantically dissimilar
→ immediately group: difficulty remembering acoustically similar
→ after 20 mins: difficulty remembering semantically similar
→ suggests STM codes acoustically (as relies on this thus got confused when
remembering 2 acoustically similar words), LTM codes semantically (as relies on
this thus got confused when remembering 2 semantically similar words)
evaluation
+ identified separate memory stores
→ supports multi-store model as identified difference between STM & LTM
+ independent groups design
→ reduces demand characteristics as less likely to guess hypothesis & change behaviour
- artificial stimuli
→ word lists had no personal meaning so lack external validity
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller isabellabateman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.98. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.