Summary
Summary Evaluation of intoxication - Criminal law
- Course
- Institution
Summary of evaluation of intoxication for OCR, written by an A* student
[Show more]
1 review
By: jkaur_uk • 5 months ago
Seller
Follow
scarlettbuckle
Reviews received
Content preview
Defence of intoxication isn’t a true defence as it is merely failure to form therequired MR due to drink, drugs or other substances, a failure to form the MR
means the offence was incomplete. Intoxication is more often unacceptable as
an excuse (an aggravating factor).
Intoxication is a major factor in the commission of many crimes. Needs to
balance the rights of D and V (if intoxication is always a defence, then V would
not be protected).
Financial burden; the cost to the NHS of anti-social behaviour from people
using alcohol balanced against tax revenue.
It is also bizarre that it is a public policy to criminalise drink and drugs, but
there is no distinction between types, all substances are treated the same
whether legal or not.
The rules on voluntary intoxication and involuntary intoxication are
inadequate - Dealing with voluntary intoxication, rape is a BIO and so
intoxication would fail as a defence. However, it could be successful if D is
charged with attempted rape, which is a SIO.
● Involuntary intoxication doesn't take into account the impact on an
individual of drink or drugs to reduce a person’s inhibitions to commit crimes
and they can still be found guilty if they were capable of forming the
necessary MR (Kingston). This ignores the fact that D was not to blame for the
intoxication.
● Reform: LC has recommended including in the new bill a specific list of
situations that will be classed as involuntary intoxication.
The distinction between specific intent and basic intent offences is flawed -
Terminology of SIO and BIO is not used elsewhere in criminal law and is
, unnecessarily confusing
● Difference between basic and specific is hard to find for some offences;
Judges admitted this in Heard.
● Intoxication is not allowed for BIOs, because getting drunk is
considered a reckless course of action and so provides the MR for the offence.
This is wrong because getting drunk is only reckless in the sense of taking a
risk of doing something stupid when drunk and does not equate to the
subjective recklessness of foreseeing the risk of the particular event
happening and going ahead anyway.
● The decision to drink may be several hours before D commits the AR of
any offence.
o O’Grady - D had fallen asleep and hit his friend some hours afterwards.
o This is contrary to the normal rule that the AR & MR must coincide.
● There is criticism of the fact that with some SIO’s (e.g. murder), there is
a lesser ‘fall-back’ BIO that the D will be convicted of (e.g. manslaughter). If P
cannot prove D had formed the MR of an SIO, but one where there is no ‘fall-
back’ BIO, then D walks free.
● Reform: LC propose to abolish and apply same rules across all offences
– fairer to D’s and society
The alternative approach taken in Richardson and Irwin would make the law
much fairer - Considers whether D would have realised the relevant risk if he
had not been drinking.
● The mere fact of being intoxicated does not automatically make a D
guilty.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller scarlettbuckle. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.46. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
78310 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now