3 elements to negligence:
Is there a duty of care owed? (Bolton v Stone – risk was small, precautions were taken) Was there a
breach of duty? Damage caused?
Caparo test determines whether a duty of care exists through: Proximity: relationship; Foreseeability: was
the harm suffered reasonably foreseeable; Fair, just & reasonable: is it fair to impose a duty of care?
Robinson: Caparo does not have to be strictly applied in every case. Bournhill v Young: third party can only
sue if they suffered harm.
Thin skull rule: must take your victim as you find them.
Res Ipsa loquitur: (Scott v London Docks 1865 – D could not explain why he was not negligent)
Damage was under the sole control of the D.
Incident could only happen if someone was negligent.
No other reason for incident to occur.
Causation and remoteness:
Nettleship v Weston (learner driver – standard of care is of reasonably competent driver). Causation and
remoteness. No factual causation if there’s an intervening act. But for test: defendant’s actions must be
direct cause of claimant’s harm in order to be liable.
Development of duty of care:
Blythe v Birmingham Waterworks (damaged water pipe): duty of care started to develop.
Donoghue v Stevenson (snail): modern law developed.
Factors which vary the standard:
Characteristics of claimant including learner: Paris v Stepney (Paris had a blind eye, employer knew risk
therefore breached his duty)
Practicality: Was there effort to prevent harm? Latimer v AEC (sawdust to prevent slipping – not breached
duty as all precautions taken)
Emergencies: Does the benefit outweigh the risk? Watt v Hertfordshire Council (breach less likely when
dealing with emergencies)
Damages:
General damages: loss of future earnings, future medical expenses, loss of ability to perform tasks.
Special damages are calculated: loss of earnings, medical costs.
Courts check to see if D can pay before court.
Sources of advice:
Solicitors, barristers, citizens advice (free charity), law centres (free volunteers), trade union membership
(monthly payment)
Sources of funding:
Pro bono (free volunteers), state funding (low income or benefits), insurance, own resources (savings if
more than £3000).
Damages are usually paid in lump sum or structured settlement.
Tracks:
Small claims track: £10,000 or less, County Court, no costs
Fast track: between £10,000 and £25,000, up to £50,000 for PI, County Court, limited fixed costs
Multi-track: £25,000 or more, County or High Court, costs.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller trbillingham. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.70. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.