Alle artikelen 2022/2023
§1.1 Article 1: Caprini J., Parker, S., & Griffin M., (2017). – A look back and a leap forward: A review and synthesis of the individual work performance literature.
§1.2 Article 2: Cascio, W.F. (2006). – The economic impact of employee behaviors on organizational...
Week 1: Performance & Performance Management (3 articles) ................................................................................................ 3
§1.1 Article 1: Caprini J., Parker, S., & Griffin M., (2017). – A look back and a leap forward: A review and synthesis of the
individual work performance literature ..........................................................................................................................................3
§1.2 Article 2: Cascio, W.F. (2006). – The economic impact of employee behaviors on organizational performance. ............6
§1.3 Article 3: Lievens. F., Schapers, P., & Amp; Herde, C.N. (2020). – Performance Management – Que Vadis? ..................8
Week 2: Performance Management and Feedback and Feedforward (5 articles)....................................................................... 9
§2.1 Article 1: Kluger, A.N. & Nir, D. (2010). - The Feedforward Interview. .............................................................................9
§2.2 Article 2: Budworth, M.H., Latham, G.P., & Manroop, L. (2015). – Looking forward to performance improvement: A
field test of the feedforward interview for performance management .......................................................................................11
§2.3 Article 3: Speer, A.B. (2018). – Quantifying with words: An investigation of the validity of narrative-derived
performance scores ......................................................................................................................................................................13
§2.4 Article 4: Silva, V.V.M., & Ribeiro, J.L.D., (2020). – A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for
assessment of individual competencies........................................................................................................................................15
§2.5 Article 5: Moon, S.H., Scullen, S.E., & Latham, G.P. (2016). – Precarious Curve Ahead: The effects of forced
distribution rating systems on job performance...........................................................................................................................16
Week 3: Case Presentation (0 articles) .................................................................................................................................... 19
§3.1 No articles due presentations.........................................................................................................................................19
Week 4: Performance Management: intended and Unintended Effects (4 articles) ................................................................. 20
§4.1 Article 1: Pritchard, R.D., Harrell, M.M., DiazGranados, D., & Guzman, M.J. (2008). – The productivity measurement
and enhancement system: A Meta-Analysis.................................................................................................................................20
§4.2 Article 2: Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S.J., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K.A. (2012). – The science of training and
development in organizations: What matters in practice. ...........................................................................................................22
§4.3 Article 3: Smith-Jentsch, K.A. (2020). – Making Smart Investment in Training: The Devel is in the Details ...................24
§4.4 Article 4: Keith, N. (2018). – Undesirable effects of goal setting on perceived fairness, commitment and unethical
behavior........................................................................................................................................................................................26
Week 5: Performance Management & Reward (4 articles) ...................................................................................................... 28
§5.1 Article 1: Park, S., & Sturman, M.C. (2016). – Evaluating form and functionality of pay-for-performance plans: The
relative incentive and sorting effects of merit pay, bonuses and long-term incentives ...............................................................28
§5.2 Article 2: Englmaier, F., Grimm, S., Schidler, D., & Schudy, S. (2018). – The effect of incentives in non-routine
analytical teams tasks-evidence from a field experiment. ...........................................................................................................30
§5.3 Article 3: Kim, J.H., Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2022). – Do financial incentives help or harm performance in interesting
tasks? 31
§5.4 Article 4: Baeten, X. (2014). – Shaping the future research agenda for compensation and benefits management: Some
thoughts based on a stakeholder inquiry. ....................................................................................................................................32
Week 6: Integration & Case Competition (2 articles) ............................................................................................................... 34
§6.1 Article 1: Arguinis, H., Gottfredons, R.K., & Joo, H. (2013). - Avoiding a “me” versus “we” dilemma: Using
performance management to turn teams into a source of competitive advantage ....................................................................34
§6.2 Article 2: Kremer, H., Villamore, I., & Arguinis, H., (2019). – Innovation Leadership: Best-Practice Recommendations
for promoting Employee Creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. ............................................................................................35
§1.1 Article 1: Caprini J., Parker, S., & Griffin M., (2017). – A look back and a leap forward: A
review and synthesis of the individual work performance literature
Research on individual work performance clusters:
1. Management cluster
2. Personnel selection perspective cluster
3. Motivation cluster
4. Good citizen cluster
5. Job attitudes cluster
Positive Work Role Behavior Model 3 Levels of performance:
1. Proficiency = individual behaviors that can be formalized and anticipated in advance ○
a. Able to fulfill requirements (well trained)
2. Adaptive performance = behaviors in which individuals cope with, respond to, and/ or support changes
a. How flexibly people can adapt to unexpected situations and still perform well
3. Proactive performance = individual agentic and self-starting, change-oriented, and future focused behavior
a. Ability to take initiative and perform
3 levels of interdependence:
1. Individual task behavior
2. Team-member behaviors
3. Organization member behaviors
, EXTRA
Work performance = individual behavior that generates value for the organization.
There are 5 clusters in the overall map of individual work performance that indicate a breadth of perspectives:
1. Management cluster (green): the role of individual performance in achieving organizationally relevant
outcomes.
2. Personnel selection perspective (blue): measurement and prediction of job performance.
3. Motivation cluster (yellow): underlying motivational mechanisms of task performance.
4. Good citizen cluster (red): OCB (Organizational Citizenship Behavior).
5. Job attitudes cluster (purple): the “happy productive” worker debate, and job design.
4 scientific maps that each represent a 10-year period, about the emergence of performance research:
1. “Understanding the core” (1972 – 1982).
2. “Flowering of dimensions” (1983 – 1993) → new concepts.
3. “Scattering in the wind” (1994 – 2004) → scattering concepts (some terms in the map have little connection
to task performance or one another).
4. “New concepts take root” (2005 – 2015) → continuing rapid growth of the field.
Understanding the Core:
Vroom’s (1964) expectancy theory = performance is a function of ability and motivation.
Goal setting theory (Locke, 1968) = how setting goals facilitates task performance.
Flowering of dimensions:
OCB = behavior that cannot be prescribed or required in advance for a given job → lubricate the social machinery of
the organization but do not directly inhere in the usual notion of task performance.
§ OCB-O: behaviors that benefit the organization, e.g. compliance.
§ OCB-I: behaviors directed at specific individuals, e.g. helping.
POB = Prosocial Organizational Behavior = behaviors targeted toward an individual, group, or organization with the
intention of improving the target’s welfare.
OCB and POB overlap: both are types of prosocial behavior.
Contextual performance = behaviors that do not support the technical core itself as much as they support the
organizational, social, and psychological environment in which the technical core must function → encompasses
both OCB and POB constructs.
Scattering in the wind:
Role-based model of performance = incorporates role theory and identity theory → 5 distinct employee roles: job,
organization, team, innovator, and career roles.
Hierarchical taxonomy of individual performance = 3 distinct dimensions: task performance, citizenship
performance, and adaptive performance.
New concepts take root:
Great eight competency framework = how work is accomplished as opposed to just the outcomes of behavior.
Model of positive work role behaviors (Griffin et al., 2007) = specifies 9 performance dimensions derived from the
combination of 2 overarching dimensions: forms of role behavior (related to uncertainty; proficiency, adaptivity,
proactivity) and levels of contribution (related to interdependence).
The individual work performance literature has largely developed, but lack a comprehensive theory to bridge topic
areas → little understanding how various performance constructs relate to one another → goal of this article to
bring various networks together.
The Griffin et al. (2007) integrative performance model: to analyze how various performance constructs fit
together→classifies work behaviors into proficient, adaptive, and proactive forms of performance; each from being
MD 2022/2023 UvA Performance Management 4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mereldubbeldam. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
