100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
WJEC Criminology Unit 3 Model Answers AC3.1 $4.57   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

WJEC Criminology Unit 3 Model Answers AC3.1

 137 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

If you are taking the unit 3 controlled assessment, these are the exact model answers I used which got me an A grade. These are well developed answers, without links to the brief (as that is relevant to your exam).

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • February 27, 2023
  • 9
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
With reference to the brief and other examples you have studied, examine sources

of information for validity (15)



EVIDENCE



 Evidence is presented to the court in a criminal trial by both the prosecution

and the defence. The evidence is examined and observed by the jury/judge,

and they determine the validity of that evidence, so they can reach a fair and

just verdict. The evidence must be credible, reliable, and admissible. The

evidence presented can be physical (weapons, fingerprints etc), testimonial

(eye-witness testimony) or expert witnesses (doctors, psychiatrists). (Refer to

the brief if there is a link).



 An expert witness is somebody who provides evidence in court that will help

the jury in their decisions. Expert witnesses are generally regarded as having

good validity as they should be objective and draw on evidence of years of

experience. However, this isn't guaranteed as expert witnesses can also

make mistakes such as in the case of Sally Clark. Sally Clark was sentenced

to life in prison in 1999 as she was found guilty of the murders of her two

infant sons. Her first child had fallen unconscious after being put to bed, and

her second son had been discovered dead. Clark was home alone with the

baby, and there was evidence of trauma. The eldest child, Christopher, was

born in September 1996 and died 11 weeks later. Sir Roy Meadows provided

expert evidence concerning the likelihood and causes of sudden infant death

syndrome in the cases of Sally Clark and Angela Cannings. Cannings was

, found guilty of the murders of her two sons in 1991 and 1999. Gemma, her

first child, died of SIDS in 1989. Her conviction was based on allegations that

she suffocated the children. Both women were convicted of the murder of

their children and later released. The trial evidence came from a world expert

on SIDS (cot deaths). Sally Clark and Angela Cannings were convicted

almost solely based on Meadow's testimony. Therefore, the currency of his

evidence was tremendous as the jury believed him. His testimony was given a

great deal of validity in court by non-expert jurors. Because different

professionals had different opinions on cot death, the outcome of the trial

depended on who you had as an expert witness in court. The outcome of the

case was dependent on interpretation and understanding. Therefore, the

circumstances of the case could be subject to invalidity. The accuracy of

the evidence used was poor as it relied heavily on statistics that proved to be

unreliable because they did not consider hereditary disposition. This means

that the statistics used were not valid. Additionally, the evidence based on

suspicion was heavily bias. If a woman had a child that died from cot death it

was always seen as a tragic accident, however, the thinking at the time was

that if 2 children from the same mother died from cot death it should be

treated with suspicion. This appeared to be true only because there was a

bias attached to it, meaning that the evidence lacked validity. Furthermore,

based on the statistics presented to the court, the first death was treated as

SIDs, but the second death changed the expert’s opinion; This opinion was

therefore not valid.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller woah2807. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81298 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$4.57  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart