100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
WJEC Criminology Unit 3 Model Answers AC2.4 $4.54   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

WJEC Criminology Unit 3 Model Answers AC2.4

 23 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

If you are taking the unit 3 controlled assessment, these are the exact model answers I used which got me an A grade. These are well developed answers, without links to the brief (as that is relevant to your exam).

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • February 27, 2023
  • 8
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
AC2.4 Assess key influences affecting the outcomes of criminal cases


Link to Brief


EVIDENCE


 Only physical or testimonial evidence presented in court may be used as evidence. It

is up to the magistrate or jury to determine how much weight to give to each piece

of evidence. In England and Wales, the law states that the prosecution must bring

evidence to prove their claim, which is known as the burden of proof. The defence is

not required to prove anything, but in practice, they will try to cast as much doubt

on the evidence as possible. In reaching a decision, the jury or magistrate must

consider all physical and testimonial evidence presented in court by witnesses. The

police must persuade the CPS that there is sufficient evidence, and the CPS must

believe that a successful conviction is possible. The prosecution team bears the

burden of proving that the suspect is guilty. In the Amanda Knox case DNA from a

bloody bra strap helped to identify a suspect.



 Although some evidence, such as DNA and fingerprints, are considered extremely

reliable and admissible in court, there is always the possibility that this evidence will

become contaminated. For example, in the case of Adam Scott he was falsely

charged with rape due to contamination of a DNA sample. Scott was arrested and

charged with rape on October 23, 2011.The evidence was a partial DNA profile

created by LGC Forensics (LGC) and believed to be from a single rape victim sample

at the time. This was later revealed to be an error caused by contamination during

laboratory testing. The British Transport Police had sent in a saliva sample following

, an alleged 'spitting incident' in Exeter. At the same time, swabs from the Manchester

woman who was attacked were sent to the lab. The contamination appears to have

occurred when DNA was extracted from the saliva sample for further analysis. The

plastic tray containing the saliva DNA samples was then reused when the rape

victim's samples were also run for DNA extraction. After isolating Scott's DNA from

the contaminated sample tray, it was run through the UK's DNA database, yielding a

partial match. As a result, the forensic report from LGC concluded that the likelihood

of the DNA being from someone unrelated to Scott was 'approximately one in one

billion.'

 Evidence can sometimes be mislabelled, causing its significance to be overlooked at

first. And the Stephen Lawrence case is an example of this. Stephen Lawrence was a

black British teenager from Plumstead in southeast London who was killed in a

racially motivated attack at the age of 18. Yvonne Turner, a forensic science

assistant, mislabelled a jacket belonging to Gary Dobson, a suspect in Lawrence's

fatal stabbing in April 1993. She went on to incorrectly record that no fibre tapings

were taken from Dobson's jacket - a yellow and grey bomber jacket - and a cardigan.

Evidence obtained from Dobson's cardigan and jacket as a result of scientific

advances, as well as David Norris' trousers and a sweatshirt, are critical to the

crown's case that the two men were part of a group of white youths who attacked

Lawrence 18 years ago. These mistakes had led to them not being convicted.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller woah2807. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.54. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.54
  • (0)
  Add to cart