100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Unit 3 AC3.2 Draw conclusions from information $20.17   Add to cart

Essay

Unit 3 AC3.2 Draw conclusions from information

1 review
 389 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

AC3.2 full marks that I used in my controlled assessment and I received an A*. This writeup was marked by my 2 criminology teachers who are also Criminology Examiners.

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • January 31, 2023
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: sadiyamahmood0 • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
AC3.2 Writeup

There are 4 conclusions: Just/Unjust Verdicts, Miscarriage of Justice, Safe/Unsafe Verdict and
Just/Unjust Sentencing



Just/Unjust Verdicts

A just verdict is a verdict handed down by the jury or magistrates that is deemed appropriate for the
crime committed by the offender. An unjust verdict is a verdict that is handed down by the jury or
magistrates that is deemed unfair or ‘over the top’ for the crime committed by the offender. An
example of a Just/Unjust Verdict is the Stephen Lawrence Case Study. We will analyse the case study
and determine whether the verdict was just or unjust.

On the 22nd of April 1993, in Eltham, South-East London, Stephen Lawrence was stabbed to death
while waiting at a bus stop with his friend. Stephen was a victim of an unprovoked attack caused by a
gang of white youths

Stephen Lawrences case has a long but important timeline to it which determines whether Stephen
Lawrences case was a Just or Unjust Verdict. After Stephens murder on the 29th July the CPS drop
charges against the suspects. As a result, in September of 1994 the family of Stephen Lawrence
launched a private prosecution which ended up failing in 1976. In 1999 the MacPherson report was
published, which identified the ‘institutional racism’ in the police force and due to this, the Criminal
Justice Act scrapped the Double Jeopardy Law in 2005 and this meant that Gary Dobson and David
Norris (the 2 suspects) could be convicted based on the new evidence and this happened as the Trial
of the 2 suspects began in 2011 based on the new evidence. Both were found guilty and were given
life sentences

Looking at the timeline there were many instances of where Stephens Case was a Just Verdict as well
as an Unjust Verdict. For example when the CPS dropped charges that is an example of an unjust
verdict. They dropped the case due to ‘insufficient evidence’. But this reasoning was primarily due to
the own police’s fault. For example the initial officer in charge of the case was temporary, he lacked
urgency and was often inactive on the case. Furthermore, police received 22 firm leads about the
suspects being a group of 5 white men but no prosecution followed from them and this is why it is
an example of an unjust verdict.

However when the MacPherson Report was published which allowed the Double Jeopardy Rule to
be scrapped which then in return allowed the trial to begin, this was an example of a Just Verdict.
This is because the trial happened again based on new evidence found by the police such as how
Stephens DNA was on one of the suspects jacket and so this was all possible thanks to the
MacPherson Report. This lead to the retrial of Dobson and Norris.

In short, the Stephen Lawrence case was an Unjust Verdict in the beginning but through further
research and more fighting from Stephens family, it became a Just Verdict in the end as both
suspects became guilty for murder in the end.



Miscarriage Of Justice

Miscarriages of justice is the failure of a court or judicial system to attain the ends of justice, which
results in the conviction of an innocent person. A miscarriage of justice is generally considered when

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller IWIS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $20.17. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$20.17  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart