100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LATEST COMPLETE PVL2602 TEST BANK $30.39   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LATEST COMPLETE PVL2602 TEST BANK

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Question 1 Nimoy and Vickie were married in community of property. On 2 March 2011, Nimoy died intestate. Nimoy is survived by: • his wife, Vickie • his adopted brother, Barry; • two granddaughters, Winnie and Lisa (the daughters of Nimoy‟s predeceased son, Celestine. Celestine was bor...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 121  pages

  • January 19, 2023
  • 121
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
PVL2602 TEST BANK

Question 1
Nimoy and Vickie were married in community of property. On 2 March
2011, Nimoy died intestate.
Nimoy is survived by:
 his wife, Vickie
 his adopted brother, Barry;
 two granddaughters, Winnie and Lisa (the daughters of Nimoy‟s
predeceased son, Celestine. Celestine was born of a previous
marriage between Nimoy and Grace);
 an extra-marital son, Gary;
 Harry and Isaac, the sons of Gary (Harry and Isaac were born of the
marriage between Gary and Zinzi).
At his death, the joint estate of Nimoy and Vickie amounted to R360 000
(net value after all debts of estate have been paid). Distribute Nimoy‟s
estate. (10)

ANSWER:
From Nimoy‟s relations we can exclude the following persons for the
purposes of intestate succession:
1) Barry – although he is the deceased‟s adopted brother and is a
potential intestate heir since his adoption has the effect of treating him
as if he were a natural collateral relation of the deceased, the fact that
the deceased‟s has closer relations, excludes Barry from inheriting.(1)
2) The deceased‟s grandsons Harry and Isaac – they will not inherit
because their father Gary is still alive. (1)

Distribution of the estate:
3) The first step is to divide the joint estate equally between the spouses
who was married in community of property. Each spouse obtains 50%
in terms of the matrimonial property regime. Thus R360 000 ÷ 2 =
R180 000. Vickie immediately receives R180 000 as this is the share
that she entitled to in terms of matrimonial property law. (1) [Note:
She does not inherit this amount, but receives it in terms of matrimonial
property law.]

4) In addition to this, Vickie is also entitled to inherit in terms of the
Intestate Succession Act. She inherits either a child‟s portion or the
ministerial amount (at present R125 000) whichever is the greater.(1)
[See section 1(1)(c) of the Act.]
5) According to the Act, a child‟s portion is obtained by dividing the
deceased estate by the number of children who have survived
the deceased (1)
6) and the children who have predeceased the deceased but are
survived by their descendants (1)
7) Plus the number of spouses (1). [The explanation of this calculation is
very important and earns 3 marks for a completely correct
explanation or no marks if it is partially correct. Note that it is not only
“the number of children of the deceased”...]
8) Thus: A child‟s share is R180 000 † 3 = R60 000. (1) [Note: The estate
1

,is divided by 3 because there are two children who survived the
deceased or who left descendants, namely Gary and Celestine, and
there is one spouse, Vickie. Thus:




2

, 2+1 = 3] Therefore Vickie will inherit R125 000 (because this is greater
than the child‟s portion which is R 60 000). (1)
9) After the spouse‟s share is deducted, the residue of the
deceased estate is divided equally between the deceased‟s
stirpes. Each child and his or her descendants form a stirps.
10) The residue is: R180 000 - R125 000 = R55 000 (1)
11) Thus: R55 000 ÷ 2 (because there are 2 stirpes, Celestine & Gary) =
R27 500 per stirpes. (1)
12) Thus Gary receives R27 500 and Winnie and Lisa, who are
Celestine‟s representative heirs, receive R13 750 each. (1)

QUESTION 2
2.1 While on a business trip, Tsepo met Yandi and had an affair with her.
She threatened to tell his wife, Bongile, unless he made a will leaving his
entire estate to her. In order to prevent his wife from finding out about
the affair, he made a new will in which he bequeathed his entire estate to
Yandi. Discuss the validity of the will in light of the animus testandi
requirement. (3)

ANSWER:
1) The will was made under duress and the testator therefore did
not have the necessary animus testandi. (1)
2) It may also be argued that, even if he did have the animus to make
a will, he did not express his will freely and therefore the will is
also invalid on this ground. (1)
3) See Spies v Smith / Kirsten v Bailey (1)

2.2 After Tsepo‟s death, Bongile found out about the affair and was so
depressed that she wrote a suicide note in which she provided:
“I want my entire estate to go to my grandparents Joe and Sophy.”
She wrote her nickname “Bungy” at the end of this letter and committed
suicide. She is survived by her fifteen year old twin daughters, Sara and
Ruth and an eighteen year old adopted son, Reggie.
Answer the following questions on these facts:
(a) Did Bongile “sign” the document as required by the Wills Act 7 of 1953?
Explain your answer. (3)

ANSWER:
1) The Wills Act requires that a testator must sign his or her will. It
does not require a person to sign with his or her ordinary or
customary signature. (1)
2) “Sign” includes the accustomed mode of signature as well as any
other mode adopted by him or her to write or sign his or her name.
It may or may not be his or her full name. (1)
3) However, a “signature” does not include a mark. (1) [A mark will,
for example, be an “X” used by an illeterate person who cannot
write his or her name.]
4) The use of a nickname is not the same as making a mark. The use
of the nickname can be seen as a “signature”. The name “Bungy”
can thus be seen as Bongile‟s signature. (1)
3

, (b) Does Bongile’s suicide note comply with all the testamentary formalities for a
valid will? Explain your answer. (3)




4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Mastersquiz1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $30.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81311 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$30.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart