The Supreme Court ruled that African American students could not be placed in classes for children with mild intellectual disability solely on basis of intellectual assessments found to be culturally and racially biased.
A. Larry P. v Riles 1972,1979
B. Armstrong v Kline 1980
C. Diana v State ...
the supreme court ruled that african american students could not be placed in classes for children with mild intellectual disability solely on basis of intellectual assessments found to be culturally
Written for
EDU
All documents for this subject (33)
Seller
Follow
julianah420
Reviews received
Content preview
EDU 203 CH. 2Pre-test questions and
answers 2023
The Supreme Court ruled that African American students could not be placed in classes
for children with mild intellectual disability solely on basis of intellectual assessments
found to be culturally and racially biased.
A. Larry P. v Riles 1972,1979
B. Armstrong v Kline 1980
C. Diana v State Board of Education 1970
D. Mills v Board of Education of the District of Columbia 1972 - answerA. Larry P. v
Riles 1972,1979
The Supreme Court decision that established the constitutional right of children with
exceptionalities to a public education, matched to their need, including specialized
instruction, regardless of their functional level.
A. Larry P. v Riles 1972,1979
B. Armstrong v Kline 1980
C. Diana v State Board of Education 1970
D. Mills v Board of Education of the District of Columbia 1972 - answerD. Mills v Board
of Education of the District of Columbia 1972
In this case, the court ruled that a state's refusal to pay for schooling in excess of 180
days for pupils with severe disabilities is a violation of their rights to an appropriate
education.
A. Lau v Nichols 1974
B. Tatro v State of Texas 1980
C. Armstrong v Kline 1980
D. Agostini v Felton 1997 - answerC. Armstrong v Kline 1980
All children, regardless of the severity of their disability, must be provided with an
education appropriate to their unique needs at no cost to the parent(s)/guardian(s) best
describes:
A.free appropriate public education
B. least restrictive environment
C. child-find
D. transition - answerA.free appropriate public education
This legislation amended PL 94-142 and mandated services for preschoolers with
disabilities, ages 3-5.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller julianah420. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
