100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Economic and Consumer Pyschology - Lecture 5 $3.36   Add to cart

Class notes

Economic and Consumer Pyschology - Lecture 5

1 review
 155 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Aantekening college 5 Economic and Consumer Psychology, Universiteit Leiden, , semester 2.

Preview 2 out of 4  pages

  • April 2, 2016
  • 4
  • 2015/2016
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • 5

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: suzannecq • 7 year ago

avatar-seller
Judgements and Decisions
The rational normative model
The Rational model of the homo economicus: expected value
- Expected value of an event
- Value x probability
- Expected value of a decision alternative
- The sum of all possible returns multiplied by their repsective
probebilities
- e.g. value of econometrics degree: probability of graduating in
econometrics (0.65) * starting salary (€2200) = 1430
- Deviation from the mode → Illustration: Bingo
- According to calculations, you should be willing to pay a
maximum of €4,75 for one bingo card…
- The bingo card costs €5.50, but people play anyway
- Actual behaviour deviates often from rational decision rules,
because a number of values are subjective:
- Value is subjective
- Probability is often determined subjectively
- Probability and value are not always combined
in a rational manner

Deviations from the normative model
Not Homo Economici: Prospect theory
- Describes how psychological (subjective) values and probabilities differ from
objective probabilities and values
- Deviations are not entirely random, the:
- Can sometimes be systematically described
- Need not lead to bad decisions
- Theory consists of two elements, similar to the normative model
- Value
- Objective value €5,-
- Subjective value, perhaps €11,- , perhaps
nothing
- Also applies to money;
- From nothing to 100 feels great
- From nothing to 200 feels twice
as great?
- Law of diminishing returns, afnemend stijgende
curve. Subjective value increases in a steeper value, but the slope
becomes smaller over time.
- Example: the Asian Disease. People prefer the
certain option when it comes to gains. People become more risk-
taking when it comes to losses.
- The Reflection effect: a gain becomes
subjectively less valuable, the higher it is. This is the same for losses,
but losses feel more intensely than equal gains.

, - Loss aversion
- The value function is less steep
for positive values (gains) than for negative values (losses),
losses feel more intensely than equal gains.
- Probablity
- Small probabilities (< 10%) given too much
weight
- Moderate probabilities (> 10%) given too little
weight
- The theory does not indicate what happens
above 90%
- But 100% probability is given decision weight 1

Other Biases in Decisions and Judgements
- Bias in finding information
- In line with theory (tunnel vision)
- Bias in sample
- e.g. size, selective sample (e.g., only friends)
- Bias isn seeing covariation
- Illusory correlation → Lecture 7 on stereotyping
- Regression effect, suggests that we over estimate the meaning of extreme
effects. Extreme effects level out over time.
- Regression to the mean
- Extreme effect will, on average, be less extreme
at another point in time
- Effect applies to stable context, so, the same chef for a long
time.
- In instable context, extreme observation can be indicative of
change (e.g., new chef)
- Dilution effect
- Information 1 → He’s an alcoholic
- Additional ‘non-diagnostic’ information → Perhaps an
alcholic (not so sure)
- Diagnostic information diluted with non-diagnostic information
- Judgement becomes more moderate and less
certain
- Especially in observers who are motivated to
form an accurate impression

Heuristics
- Rules of thumb when estimating probability and quantity
- Representativeness
- The more characteristics A shares with B, the
more likely it is that A and B are associated, B can be the
consequence of A, or B can be an exemplar of category A
- Can lead to accurate judgements
- Can lead to biases, e.g., if initial probabilities
are ignored (base-rate fallacy). Initial probability is much greater that a
man works in construction industry than in a library
- Conjuction Fallacy

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nikiekuijt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83637 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.36
  • (1)
  Add to cart