100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
History CIE IGCSE Core Topic 5 Summary notes $12.35   Add to cart

Summary

History CIE IGCSE Core Topic 5 Summary notes

 90 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

History CIE IGCSE Core Topic 5 Summary notes from Ben Walsh Option B: 20th Century Modern World History for CIE IGCSE History (chapter 5)

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • No
  • Chapter 5
  • December 22, 2022
  • 10
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
  • 200
avatar-seller
Core topic 5- How effectively did the USA contain the spread of Communism?

Case study 1: the Korean War

Origins

Outbreak of the Korean War

Korea under Japanese rule until 1945. After WW2, North liberated by USSR, South by US: When the
war ended:

- North remained communist-controlled, communist leader, one-party system (Soviet style)
- South = anti-communist, not democratic, but won support of USA
 Bitter hostility between Syngman Rhee (South leader) and Kim Il Sung (North leader)-
reunification unlikely.
 In 1950, war began with North overwhelming south, only small corner of south-east Korea
left (Pusan).

The US response

 Korea was example (in eyes of Truman) of how communism would spread without US
intervention
 Containment was the aim, but there were many methods of achieving this aim
 USA attitude- do anything (but war) to stop spread of communism
 Truman sent advisers, supplies, warships
 UN intervention instead of US looks better to world

UN Resolution 84

- US biggest contributor to UN budget; most powerful
- Normally, USSR would veto this resolution, but it was boycotting the UN (since communist
China was not allowed to join)
- Therefore, USSR was not present at meeting to veto the resolution
- Truman was able to claim, after the resolution had been passed, that this was a UN-
sponsored mission (not US)
- Under resolution, UN allowed to use member armies to push North Koreans out of South
Korea
o 18 states provided support (mostly US/UK allies)
o Army was majority American, and General MacArthur (commander) also American

Development

September 1950- UN force advances

UN forces stormed ashore at Inchon (September 1950). Other UN forces and South Korean troops
advanced from Pusan. North Koreans pushed back to 38th parallel in weeks

October 1950- UN force presses on

Americans did not stop after achieving original aim. Despite warnings from Mao Tse-tung that if they
continued, China would join war, UN approved plan to advance into North Korea

US forces reached Yalu River + Chinese border by October- MacArthur + Truman saw opportunity to
fully remove communism from Korea

, November 1950- UN force retreats

In late October, 200 000 Chinese troops joined North Koreans, strong attack, committed to
communism, modern tanks provided by USSR (who had become a nuclear power in 1949)- UN
pushed back to South Korea

Bad winter conditions- Americans not used to them, matter of habit for Chinese (similar landscape)

April 1951- MacArthur sacked

MacArthur wanted to carry on war, invade China (nuclear if necessary). Truman wanted to stop-
communism had been contained. Risk of war with USSR too great.

In March 1951, MacArthur ignored Turman, threatening attack on China- Truman removed him

June 1951- peace talks begin

Fighting reached stalemate around 38th parallel, pace talks began, fighting continued

July 1953- armistice

Eisenhower replaced Truman
in 1952- he wanted to end
war. Stalin died in March
1953- Chinese + North
Koreans less confident.

Armistice signed in July 1953-
border remained practically
unchanged

Consequences of Korean War

Casualties (including civilians)
were big- 800 000 North
Koreans and Chinese soldiers,
500 000 South Korean civilians and 30 000 American troops died.

A success for containment?

Yes: despite cost + casualties, USA had will + means to contain communism

No: war showed limits of policy- North Korea remained communist, tensions between American
leaders: hard-line anti-communists wanted to push back communism, thought Truman was weak.
Moderate politicians = not worth the risk of war.

Tensions would affect US policy- North Korea would continue to trouble USA. With help from China,
North Korea + communist dictatorship, nuclear power (threatening Japan + South Korea- USA allies)

Methods of containment

War was too expensive. Two new methods: alliances + development of new weapons

Alliances with anti-communist countries

US created network of these alliances:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rdas07. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $12.35. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77016 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$12.35
  • (0)
  Add to cart