Political Communication and Journalism (775334005Y)
Établissement
Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)
Study notes containing all the material from lectures & important materials from the book and literature needed for the Political Communication & Journalism exam (year 2). You can use them to complement with your own notes.
Course grade = 8.3.
Also includes illustrations from theories seen in...
Political Communication and Journalism (775334005Y)
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (3)
2
revues
Par: appiee75 • 1 semaine de cela
Par: inesanchezsantiago • 11 mois de cela
Vendeur
S'abonner
AndreaValdivia
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
1. Political Communication: Introduction
1.1. Political Communication
• Political communication = the interactions between
politics, media and the public.
• Deals with the relationship between (1) political actors,
(2) public & (3) media / journalists.
• Research is driven by the question: who shapes these relationships, and ultimately who
controls whom?
• We must focus on power relations.
• There is limited media attention, thus politicians ght for it.
A. Media Functions
What do we expect from media?
• (Free) media as fourth estate – In democracies, we want free media
independent from the state power (executive branch )
• Functions of media in Democratic society:
(1) Information – monitoring & inform the citizens (audience) what is happening in society.
(2) Education – explaining what events and facts mean for people to understanding them.
(3) Platform – Place where people exchange of ideas & ideas meet (e.g. virtual media, social
media) → Public sphere – people can discuss opinions, arguments and positions in order to reach
a consensus.
(4) Watchdog – Control over politics (governments and companies), publicity for what politics
does (wrong) – we expect journalists to be on top of issues & investigate politicians (e.g.
corruption scandals)
(5) Channel – Political, ideological opinions needs to nd their way to the people. Organizations
have the right and need to communicate w/ citizens (now is more direct).
1
fi fi
,B. What do we expect from journalists?
• Role conceptions (David Weaver) = several can happen at the same time.
• What journalists think their tasks/ responsibilities are.
• They can have several role conceptions at the same time
1. Disseminator of info = journalists provide info about events, issues.
• Fast information dissemination and veri cation of facts.
• Example = Peruvian journalist Mavila Huertas informing about electoral campaigns on TV
in Canal N.
2. Interpreter (explaining) = makes info clearer to an audience
• Make the news come alive for audience in the same way as the reporter = make sense of
events.
• Example = Peruvian journalist Marco Sifuentes informing about the protests in Ica
from agriculture complaining about working conditions in Peru in his channel “La
Encerrona”.
• They provide analyze + interpret complex issues + investigate government claims.
3. Adversarial (vs. politicians and businesses) = watchdog of media – critical about government
or companies.
• Adopting a stance of opposition + critical style in order to expose perceived wrongdoings
= politician adversary of journalist
• Example = Peruvian journalist Rosa Maria Palacios remaining critical about
measures to reopen malls by Martin Vizcarra in her channel “Sin Guion”.
4. Populist mobilizer – mobilize people = actively making people engage
in society and make their voices out + put things on the agenda + take
positions and make issues appear on agenda.
• Giving a voice to ‘ordinary’ citizens and providing entertainment.
• Example = Peruvian journalist Marco Sifuentes informing about
the protests in Lima for the illegal impeachment of Martin Vizcarra in Peru in his
channel “La Encerrona”.
• Example = Jon Oliver = Uygurs china.
1.2. US Situation about News & Journalism Bennett
• Free market is not delivering news as they should.
2
fi
,• To take the quality of news reporting under control, we must nd ways to support journalism
for it survive.
• Low interest in media or politics, little to no political knowledge.
• There are problems everywhere:
▪ Little money
▪ Distrust in the media
▪ Selective exposure
▪ Little trust in politics
1.3. Negative Campaigning
• Negative campaigning (a.k.a. attack politics or mudslinging) = characteristic of the message
• The ‘tone’ of the message (direction of message)
• Negative = attack or criticism against the opponents programs, ideas, policies,
record, … (decrease opponents support)
• Positive = promotion of one’s programs, ideas, policies, record… (increase your
support)
• BUT It is not necessarily so extreme.
• Purpose: Provide electoral bene ts:
• Undermining rivals’ competence evaluations
• Demobilizing support for the targeted politician or party
• Mobilizing supporters
• Persuading undecided and risk-averse voters to cast their vote for the ‘lesser evi’l.
• Two types:
1. Policy Attacks = they do not attack the opponent on his character, but in
something they did wrong (e.g. policies)
2. Character Attacks = they attack the opponent on his character, not his policies or
wrongdoings.
• When is a campaign negative?
• Depends on the proportion of negative messages (whether + positive or + negative
messages in the campaign).
• Negativity =
• in the eye of the beholder – intensity of negativity should be taken into
account as well.
3
fi fi
, • People perceive negativity in di erent ways
• People tend to evaluate intensity of attack
• Stronger attack = seen as worse/ more negative
• BUT def. of negative campaigning is perceived in extremes =
either is or not an attack.
• Ex: Shows distribution of all answers – we tend to evaluate the
intensity of the attack.
• has a clear normative de cit: votes dislike negativity.
• BUT Currently not the most negative campaign ever in the US (according to
US citizens).
• US 2020 Not the most interesting campaign
• Haselmayer et al. (2019) =
• Negative campaigning in uences political support + —> used to gain media
attention.
• Media like negativity (part of media logic) = negative campaigning easily gets
attention
• Traditional media still important source of info.
• Attention needed by political actors to convey their campaign
messages to broad public.
• Opportunity for less powerful politicians (especially for rank-and-
le politicians like MPs)
• News value = negativity = factor more likely to become news.
• Best NOT to attack on your own best issues, but on issues owned by the target.
• Attack them on their best issue – weaken them.
• Issue-ownership = when a political actor or party is considered as best suitable to
deal w/ certain issue (e.g. a green party about the environment).
• More media attention probably better for those issues owned by the target
than your own.
• Parties address these issues important to audiences.
A. Negative campaigning in US
• Occurs often in the US = most ads are negative.
• Ex: Heil Trump
• Vali & Nai (2020): Negative campaigning is not just done in the US, but worldwide = candidate
pro le + context matters (moderates).
4
fi fi
flfi ff
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur AndreaValdivia. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour $6.93. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
