100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Voluntary Manslaughter $7.39   Add to cart

Class notes

Voluntary Manslaughter

 28 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Lecture notes on voluntary manslaughter

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • December 12, 2022
  • 7
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Jonathon mcgahan
  • Voluntary manslaughter
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Partial Defences to Murder – Voluntary Manslaughter




Homicide Offences
Where D has the intention to kill/do GBH
- The appropriate charge is murder
- Three partial defences are available on a charge of murder:
 Loss of control
 Diminished responsibility
 Suicide pact
- Where D successfully pleads one of these partial defences, the conviction is for
“voluntary manslaughter.”

Where D kills, but does not have intention of murder/GBH
- Two possible charges – manslaughter by gross negligence / manslaughter via an
unlawful and dangerous act (constructive manslaughter).

There are two types of manslaughter known as ‘involuntary manslaughter.’

Elements of a plea of provocation under s.3 Homicide Act 1957

Provocative conduct
D had a sudden and temporary loss of self-control
Provocation was sufficient to make reasonable person do as D did.

1. Provocative Conduct
The main problem with this limb was the lack of adequate restrictions as to what could
amount to provocative conduct
“… provoked (whether by things done or said or by both together)…”

R v Doughty [1986]

Third party provocation – R v Pearson [1992] – R v Davies [1975]
Cumulative provocation – R v Pearson [1992] – R v Humphreys [1995]
Self-induces provocation – R v Johnson [1989]

, 2. Loss of Self Control
This created particular problems for abused women who would often not suffer from the
right type of loss of control.

R v Duffy [1949]

(Najinadr Singh (1992) The Times, January 30.) "Husband set free after strangling nagging
wife"

- Must be ‘sudden and temporary.’
- D must not be acting out of revenge.
- There must not be a cooling off period.

R v Richens [1993] – Loss of control means an inability to restrain oneself.

How long does a ‘cooling off period’ last?
- R v Ahluwahlia [1992]
- R v Baille [1995]

3. The provocation must be sufficient to make the reasonable do as D did
Who is the reasonable person?
What characteristics can be attributed to the reasonable person?
- Those affecting the gravity of the provocation
- Those affecting D’s levels of self-control

Luc Thiet Thuan v R [1997] (objective approach)

AG for Jersey v Holley [2005] (objective approach)
Confirmed in R v James and Karimi [2006]

R v Smith (Morgan) [2001] (subjective approach)

When must the defence be put to the jury?
There could only be an issue of provocation to be considered by the jury if the judge was of
the opinion that there was some evidence of a specific act or words of provocation resulting
in a loss of self-control.

Acott v R [1997] 1 WLR 306


The defence of loss of control under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

Section 56
This section simply announces the abolition of the old defence of provocation by the repeal
of that (s.3 of the Homicide Act 1957).
- Burden and standard of proof and the role of judge and jury.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kelseypearce. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart