100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary C12 BUS LAW - CASE ANALYSIS 1 - OPTION WIRELESS, LTD. V. OPENPEAK, INC. ASHWORTH COLLEGE $10.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary C12 BUS LAW - CASE ANALYSIS 1 - OPTION WIRELESS, LTD. V. OPENPEAK, INC. ASHWORTH COLLEGE

1 review
 137 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

C12 BUS LAW - CASE ANALYSIS 1 - OPTION WIRELESS, LTD. V. OPENPEAK, INC. ASHWORTH COLLEGE.Summarize the facts of the case OpenPeak, Inc. were in the process of producing a computer tablet product for a client and during the production, placed a purchase order for embedded wireless data from Optio...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • November 3, 2022
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: kesheida • 2 months ago

avatar-seller
Option Wireless, Ltd. v. OpenPeak, Inc. 1


C12 - Business Law

Case Analysis 1



Option Wireless, Ltd. v. OpenPeak, Inc.



Summarize the facts of the case

OpenPeak, Inc. were in the process of producing a computer tablet product for a client and

during the production, placed a purchase order for embedded wireless data from Option Wireless, Ltd.

The purchase order was to include details for the 12,300 units to be purchased at the price of USD

$848,700. Both the Buyer and Seller settled on the how many shipments the order would arrive in initially

and concluded the exact number of units and price that would be included in the final shipment,

dependent on a deposit which would be paid in full for the remaining balance. The buyer’s invoice

contained terms on this arrangement and, in addition, also contained a clause stating the buyer had a

maximum of fourteen days to contest any area of the invoice as they see fit. The contract also stated that

if this term was not complied with, the seller would not carry any responsibility for any damages incurred.

Once the remaining balance was paid, the final shipment was sent however upon inspection of the units,

the buyer concluded that the shipment contained multiple defects as they did not meet the specifications

previously agreed upon. In light of this, the Buyer formally rejected the shipment and returned the

defective modules approximately three months later. The seller requested that data be provided from the

buyer to prove there was no such deficiency. Even though the buyer complied, the seller has not provided

proof that there were no defects. The Buyer would like the seller to be charged a total of four criminal

counts, three of which including counts as contractual breach and the fourth count to include unjust

enrichment. The Seller moved to dismiss all contractual breach charges however motion to dismiss was

denied in favor of the buyer.

, Option Wireless, Ltd. v. OpenPeak, Inc. 2




Identify the parties and explain each party’s position


OpenPeak, Inc. is identified as the Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff and Buyer whereas Option

Wireless, Ltd is identified as the Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Seller. The Defendant’s position in

the case is to receive compensation for direct as well as consequential damages regarding the order

that was placed and delivered with defective units. The defendant claims there was a breach of

contract. The Plaintiff’s position is that the buyer did not comply with the terms listed on the

purchase order which gives a time restraint on the return of units that were unsatisfactory.




Outline the case’s procedural history including any appeals


The case was brought to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Option Wireless, Ltd filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim of OpenPeak, Inc. A decision by the

court was made to deny this request. There are no appeals on records regarding this decision.




What is the legal issue in question in this case?


The legal issue in question in this case is if an invoice produced by the seller is

considered as a proper means of accepting the offer set out by the buyer, by way of a

purchase order, in the event that the invoice specifically discloses a restriction on how

significantly damaged goods are recovered but the purchase order did not. If there is in fact a

contract that has been executed, where is the location of the terms placed within the contract.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyConnect. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73314 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.49  2x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart