100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NUR 3047 Sepsis/Septic Shock UNFOLDING Reasoning Case Study,100% CORRECT $15.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NUR 3047 Sepsis/Septic Shock UNFOLDING Reasoning Case Study,100% CORRECT

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

NUR 3047 Sepsis/Septic Shock UNFOLDING Reasoning Case Study STUDENT Jack Holmes, 72 years old Primary Concept Perfusion Interrelated Concepts (In order of emphasis) • Inflammation • Infection • Tissue Integrity • Clinical Judgment • Patient Education • Communication...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 16  pages

  • September 22, 2022
  • 16
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
NUR 3047Sepsis/Septic Shock UNFOLDING Reasoning Case Study
STUDENT




Jack Holmes, 72 years old

Primary Concept
Perfusion
Interrelated Concepts (In order of emphasis)
• Inflammation
• Infection
• Tissue Integrity
• Clinical Judgment
• Patient Education
• Communication
NCLEX Client Need Categories Percentage of Items from Each Covered in
Category/Subcategory Case Study
Safe and Effective Care Environment
✓ Management of Care 17-23% ✓
✓ Safety and Infection Control 9-15%
Health Promotion and Maintenance 6-12% ✓
Psychosocial Integrity 6-12% ✓
Physiological Integrity
✓ Basic Care and Comfort 6-12% ✓
✓ Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies 12-18% ✓




Copyright © 2018 Keith Rischer, d/b/a KeithRN. All Rights reserved.

, ✓ Reduction of Risk Potential 9-15% ✓
✓ Physiological Adaptation 11-17% ✓
History of Present Problem:
Jack Holmes a 72-year-old Caucasian male brought to the ED by ambulance from a skilled nursing facility
(SNF). According to report from the paramedic, when the SNF nursing staff attempted to wake him this
morning, he would not respond, and his BP was 74/40 with a MAP of 51. He has a history of Parkinson’s
disease, COPD, CHF, HTN, depression, and a stage IV decubitus ulcer on his coccyx that developed three
months ago. He does not follow commands, is unresponsive to verbal stimuli, but responds to a sternal rub
with grimacing and withdrawing from stimulus.

Personal/Social History:
He has lived in the skilled nursing facility the past three years and has been bed bound the past year due to his
advanced Parkinson’s disease. He was a heavy smoker, 1 PPD for 40 years until he moved to the SNF.

What data from the histories are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the
nurse?
(Reduction of Risk Potential)
RELEVANT Data from Present Clinical Significance:
Problem:
BP of 74/40 (51) Low blood pressure and low MAP – indicator of poor perfusion

Has had stage IV ulcer for 3 months. No signs of healing – could
Stage IV decubitus ulcer on coccyx – bed be due to poor perfusion, poor nutrition, poor wound care, or not
bound participating in q2 turns while bed bound. Poor skin integrity.

Only responsive to sternal rub – Unresponsive to anything other than a sternal rub is a sign of an
grimacing and withdrawing from altered level of consciousness – assuming that this is not baseline
stimulus for this patient.

Comorbidities that can relate to a decrease in immune function.
COPD, HTN, CHF, old age, and
Parkinson’s

RELEVANT Data from Social History: Clinical Significance:
Lives in SNF for past 3 years Higher risk for infection or illness due to exposure and living
conditions at facility
Is the family involved? What kind of care does he receive at this
facility?
Bed bound
Skin integrity, muscle atrophy, isolation
Depression
Isolation, unable to advocate for self

Patient Care Begins
Current VS: P-Q-R-S-T Pain Assessment:
T: 103.4 F/39.7 C Provoking/Palliative: Not responsive verbally, withdraws to pain, no other indicators
(oral) of pain
P: 135 (irregular) Quality:

Copyright © 2018 Keith Rischer, d/b/a KeithRN. All Rights reserved.

, R: 32 (regular) Region/Radiation:
BP: 76/39 MAP: 51 Severity:
O2 sat: 91% 2 liters Timing:
n/c

What VS data are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse?
(Reduction of Risk Potential/Health Promotion and Maintenance)
RELEVANT VS Clinical Significance:
Data:
High temp Sign of infection in the body

Increased HR Compensating for the low BP – trying to oxygenate the tissues

Low BP One indicator of sepsis and septic shock.

Oxygen sat is low Oxygen saturation is on the lower side; however, this could be a normal reading for
someone who has COPD. The patient has COPD and a history of heavy smoking (1
pack/day for 40 years).



Current
Assessment:
GENERAL Pale and warm to touch. Appears tense.
APPEARANCE:
RESP: Tachypneic and working hard to breathe, intercostal and suprasternal retractions
present. Breath sounds diminished and light crackles in lower lobes bilat. Nail beds
have noticeable clubbing, barrel chest present.
CARDIAC: Pale, 1+ pitting edema lower extremities, systolic murmur with an irregular rhythm,
radial pulses weak and thready, cap refill 3 seconds
NEURO: Does not open eyes to sound or pain, withdraws to pain, incomprehensible sounds to
painful stimuli, does not follow commands but does not resist when moved on a
stretcher. PERRL
GI: Distended abdomen, firm/nontender, bowel sounds hypoactive in all quadrants
GU: Foley catheter placed to monitor urine output. 50 mL tea-colored urine with no
sediment, and no odor present
SKIN: Stage IV decubitus to coccyx 1 cm x 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm depth, wound bed with visual
bone noted at the base with large areas of necrosis on both sides of the sacrum bone.
When dressing was removed, a large amount of yellow/green purulent drainage on
dressing with a foul odor. Mucus membranes dry and pale.

Determine current Glasgow coma scale score based on neurological assessment data:

Glasgow Coma Scale
Eye Opening
Spontaneous 4
To sound 3
To pain 2
Copyright © 2018 Keith Rischer, d/b/a KeithRN. All Rights reserved.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ElonMusk. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $15.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75391 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$15.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart