Introduction To Economics And Business Economics (ECB1IEBE)
Class notes
Theme 7: Law & economics articles & reading questions - Introduction To Economics And Business Economics (ECB1IEBE)
10 views 0 purchase
Course
Introduction To Economics And Business Economics (ECB1IEBE)
Institution
Universiteit Utrecht (UU)
This document contains the necessary material for Theme 7 of the course Introduction to Economics and Business Economics. The document contains the articles (Coase 1960: The problem of social cost & Sandel 2012: Markets & Morals) and addresses the related theme questions.
Introduction To Economics And Business Economics (ECB1IEBE)
All documents for this subject (29)
Seller
Follow
bodejong2001
Reviews received
Content preview
Theme 7: Law & Economics – Articles + Reading questions
Coase 1960: The problem of social cost
Certain firm’s actions have harmful effect on other firms externalities
The economic analysis of such a situation has usually proceeded in terms of a divergence between
the private and social costs (product) of firms most economists agree on the idea that it is
desirable to make the owner of the harm inflicting firm liable for the damage caused, or alternatively,
the owner should pay taxes to compensate for the damage done Coase does not agree with these
ideas both parties should be treated equally A harms B, but to avoid the harm to B it would
inflict harm on A reciprocal nature comparing the values of what is obtained and what is
sacrificed comparing the situations of firms A and B and exploring what can be done to solve the
problem, because avoiding harm for B causes harm for A.
The economic problem in all cases of harmful effects is how to maximise the value of production.
The Coase Theorem states that under ideal economic conditions, where there is a conflict of
property rights, the involved parties can bargain or negotiate terms that will accurately reflect the
full costs and underlying values of the property rights at issue.
The economic problem with externalities Externalities are the costs or benefits that affect
someone who did not ask for these costs of benefits. Naturally, legal costs, or the costs of
litigation, often fall into this category. The law aims to justify these costs by making the person
who is at “fault” responsible for most of them.
Coase mentions that this cost apportioning is not always economically efficient. Coase argues
that we should eliminate transaction costs. He argues that parties should barter with each other
to apportion expenses, leading to a fairer allocation than letting the courts decide.
Coase challenges the traditional economic approach to externalities, also known as Pigou’s
Approach. The example often cited is that if a plant (X) causes $100 damage in pollution every
year, the law should tax it $100 per year until it is fixed. If the plant can install a product to clear
the pollution at a cost of, say, $90, the tax penalty will stop.
Coase claims that there is a major social problem with this approach. He claims that if X (the plant),
gives out pollution harming Y (the local community), then making X pay $100 to the community
each year allows Y to benefit by damaging X. The tax penalty each year has not solved the problem.
It has simply created another one.
Instead, Coase proposes an alternative solution. This involves looking at what is economically
efficient for everyone, which doesn’t always follow what the law states. For example, if it is
cheaper for X to pay for Y to move away, instead of paying $100 in tax per annum, then Y should
be moved somewhere else. This might cost X $40, not $100. By taxing X $100 every year, X is
effectively paying more than the $100 of pollution damage it has caused.
Internalize, rather than externalize, the costs = fairer. Once the parties agree between themselves
what the fairest solution is, the costs are typically very low. However, when the parties litigate the
issue, the costs skyrocket. Lawyers must determine who has what rights, how they can be
enforced, and a whole host of other issues. Internalizing costs at the outset is fairer and more
efficient for everyone involved.
The problem, Coase explains, lies in the difference between social and private costs. How these
costs are apportioned is often unfair. In the above example, the unintended social cost is the
damage to the community, i.e. pollution. The law typically forces the party at fault to cover these
costs. Coase suggests we need to entirely reimagine the benefits of the polluting activities as
weighed against its downsides.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bodejong2001. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
