100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
C216 MBA Capstone Task 2: T.K. Sensors Performance Evaluation $10.29   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

C216 MBA Capstone Task 2: T.K. Sensors Performance Evaluation

1 review
 313 views  2 purchases

C216 MBA Capstone Task 2: T.K. Sensors Performance Evaluation C216 MBA Capstone Task 2: T.K. Sensors Performance Evaluation Name Name Name Name D. 1. Analyze your performance for three of the eight years in comparison to one of your competitors. Erie (T.K. Se...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • August 20, 2022
  • 17
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (1)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: shnaikaoltin • 9 months ago

avatar-seller
GradeProfessor
Task 2
C216 MBA Capstone Task 2: T.K. Sensors Performance Evaluation
C216 MBA Capstone
Task 2: T.K. Sensors Performance
Evaluation Name
Name
Name
Name
1 2D. 1. Analyze your performance for three of the eight years in comparison to one of your
competitors.
Erie (T.K. Sensors) vs. Ferris (Competition) Years: Six (2024), Seven (2025), and Eight (2026)
Return on Sales (ROS): Also referred to as the Net Profit Margin ; Return on Sales determines the net income acquired for every dollar generated from sales. To calculate ROS, net income is divided by net sales. During the final three years of operation, Erie generated a higher Return on Sales than our competitor Ferris, as shown in the chart below. Erie’s ROS was
considerably higher than Ferris for the final three rounds of competition, but was unstable in comparison to Ferris,’ small but steady, increments. With data retrieved from the Capstone Courier, Ferris’ leading cause of mediocre ROS was high labor and material costs that created a minimal profit margin.
The substantial decline in ROS Erie faced in 2025 was purely the consequences of the mishandlings of our traditional product Echo. At T.K. Sensors inception, Echo was our high end sensor. Since customer buying criteria called for an age of 0 for high end sensors, it was impossible to reach that benchmark with an established product. It was decided that Echo would become a traditional product due to the success of our other traditional sensor Eat. Echo’s automation reached 7.5, which made it impossible for Research and Development to adjust the buying criteria and revision date to make a successful product. Echo was creating financial havoc
for T.K. Sensors and it was essential to end its production. After Echo’s demise, T.K. sensors was able to recover in year eight and bring ROS to 12.21% at the end of 2026. 3Return on Assets (ROA): Return on Assets is a profitability ratio that is calculated by dividing net income by the total value of assets. Some examples of assets owned by a traditional business are as follows: inventory, cash, vehicles, plants, machinery, and equipment. ROA measures the percentage of every dollar contributed into the company that returns a profit. Assets
are compared to how much profit was generated during the same year’s operation to demonstrate
how efficient your company was at utilizing those assets to cultivate a profit.
In comparison to Ferris, Erie was able to harvest a higher ROA on all three of the final years of competition. In Erie’s worst year, 2025 (Year 7), we had $0 of cash in hand in comparison to Ferris’ $36,299. The lack of currency, an emergency loan, and excess inventory of
$34,607 contributed to T.K. Sensors ROA to reach a meager 2.77% for year 7. One area Erie excelled, was maintaining relatively low variable costs in comparison to the other five organizations. In hindsight we should have kept fewer inventories from year to year and saved a tremendous amount of money by discontinuing Echo in round four. Echo’s drain on finances negatively affected Erie’s bottom line. Unlike Ferris, Erie had difficulty in generating high sales numbers. Ferris had an extensive advantage on Erie with 40% higher in sales revenue but failed to use their revenue effectively. From 2024 to 2026 Ferris had a greater amount of cash, low amount of account receivables, and limited plant and equipment. Ferris failed to capitalize a high
ROA because it retained excessive amounts of cash instead of investing in research & development and production.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GradeProfessor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73314 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.29  2x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart