, Certainty and Intention to Create Legal Relations (ITCLR) - Lecture Notes
PART 1: INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS (ITCLR)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS
This is the third formation element to form a valid contract.
General Rule:
Agreements will not be enforced unless the parties intended to create contractual
relations.
When does this rule not apply?
Mentorship/Apprenticeship Scheme
Edmonds v. Lawson [2000] QB 501 - This case involves a pupil barrister who was
not being paid. At that time, there were a few chambers which had took on unpaid
pupillages. The pupil sued requesting for a reasonable minimum wage.
Held: The court had concluded that this apprenticeship situation was not an ITCLR
situation as originally there was no expectation to be paid. It was not considered to
be a normal commercial agreement.
Social/Domestic Relations
In the case of agreements entered into in a domestic context the presumption is that
the parties did not intend to create legal relations.
Balfour v. Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 - This involves a married couple. Mr Balfour was
a civil engineer, and worked for the Government as the Director
of Irrigation in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka). Mrs Balfour was living with him. In August
1915, they both came back to England during Mr Balfour's leave. However, Mrs
Balfour had developed rheumatic arthritis. Her doctor advised her to stay in
England, because the Ceylon climate would be detrimental to her health. Mr
Balfour's boat was about to set sail, and he orally promised her £30 a month until
she came back to Ceylon. They drifted apart, and Mr Balfour wrote saying it was
better that they remain apart. In 1918, she obtained a divorce, a ‘decree nisi’. The
wife had ultimately sued Mr Balfour to keep up with the monthly £30 payments.
Held: The court disagreed because at the time of agreement, they were a happily
married couple. As a result, the general presumption as to how domestic relation
do not have ITCLR applied.
Significance: Establishes the presumption in domestic cases (between two family
members).
Jones v. Padavatton [1969] 1 WLR 328 - A case involving a mother and daughter,
with the mother being Mrs Jones and the daughter being Mrs Padavatton. The
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sirjacktan. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.34. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.