BPP University College Of Professional Studies Limited (BPP)
Criminal Exam Bundle (Revision Notes).
High distinction achieved in Criminal Litigation and in LPC course overall.
Useful for open note exams to quickly consult topic area as well as to memorise for closed note.
Exam Structures usefully highlighted.
BPP University College Of Professional Studies Limited (BPP)
Unknown
Criminal Litigation (CRIMINAL)
All documents for this subject (12)
1
review
By: phyliss-angelinadankyi-fenty • 6 months ago
Seller
Follow
LPCdistinctionsuccess
Reviews received
Content preview
CRIMINAL EXAM DOCUMENT
Table of Contents
The court is required to pass a sentence that is commensurate with the seriousness of the offence.
This will be determined by assessing the culpability of the offender and the harm caused by the
offender...............................................................................................................................................77
Janine has two previous convictions for theft (shoplifting) (s. 65 SA 2020).........................................77
The ransacking of the property to make it look like a burglary............................................................77
Mitigating factors:...............................................................................................................................77
Different Jurisdictions of the Criminal Courts…………………………………………………………………………….4
Professional Conduct Rules in Criminal Cases………….……………………………………………………………..6
Exam Question Structure for PCR………………………………………………………………………………………9
,SGS 1 – THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE RULES AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ISSUES
Apply the Criminal Procedure Rules (CrPR) in relation to the overriding objective and the
court’s case management powers
THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES (outlined in case R V K):
CPR 2015 – apply to all criminal cases in the criminal courts – main rules of focus are in 1-3.
Criminal Procedure Rule Relevance
1.1 (1) Overriding Objective – criminal cases be dealt with justly
1.1(2) Justly includes -
(b) Dealing with prosecution + defence fairly
(c) Recognising the rights of the defendant, particularly Article 6 ECHR
(e) Dealing with case efficiently and expeditiously
1.2(1) Duty of participants in the case – (a) Prepare and conduct case in accordance
with overriding objective.
(b) Comply with rules, PD, and directions made by court.
1.3 Court must further the overriding objective when exercising any power
3.2(1) (Case Management) Court’s Duty – further the overriding objective by actively managing the case
3.2 (2) Active case management includes: (a) Early identification of real issues
(b) Early identification of needs of witnesses
(f) Discouraging delay
(g) Encouraging participants to co-operate in the progression of the case
3.3(1) Each party must actively assist the court in fulfilling its duty under 3.2
3.5(1) Court’s case management powers are wide – Court may give any direction and
take any steps actively to manage a case unless that direction or step would be
inconsistent with legislation.
3.5(6) Sanctions if standard directions below are not complied with:
Fix, postpone, bring forward, cancel hearing, make a costs order, other sanctions
3.7(1) Parties can agree to vary time limit fixed by a direction
3.9(2) Case may proceed if defendant is absent – so as not to cause delay
3.10(3) Each party should have a certificate of readiness, confirming directions have been
complied with and witnesses are ready
Court have adopted STANDARD DIRECTIONS:
(I) Crown must serve evidence within 28 days of the not guilty plea being entered + comply
with duty of disclosure + serve notice of intention to introduce bad character and
hearsay evidence.
(II) Defence must serve defence statement, within 14 days. Within 7 days defence must
indicate if any application to introduce a defendant’s bad character is to be opposed.
3
, (III) Within 14 days defence must give notice of any intention to introduce hearsay evidence
+ bad character evidence of the prosecution. Crown has further 14 days to make a
disclosure.
(IV) Any point of law must be within skeleton arguments at least 21 days before trial – both
parties to serve a certificate of readiness 7 days before trial.
Identify the differing jurisdictions and powers of the criminal courts
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM:
Criminal justice system is an adversarial system and is often perceived as comprising the police
and the prosecution on one side and the defence on the other.
This means it is the role of the prosecution to present sufficient admissible evidence to persuade a
tribunal to convict the defendant BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.
A simple case progression:
1. Reasonable grounds: arrest must be made on reasonable grounds that suspect has
committed the offence.
2. Sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of Billy’s conviction: whether there is
sufficient evidence to charge Billy (CPS considers)
3. Plea: Billy will be asked to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Which he chooses is dependant
on the strength of the prosecution and evidence.
4. Trial: Burden rests with the prosecution, prosecution opens the case. Here it is possible for
the defence to make a submission of “no case to answer” saying the prosecution has failed
to present an arguable case.
If there is a case to answer, tribunal will decide if the CPS has proved the case against Billy
BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.
THE CRIMINAL COURT SYSTEM:
Courts of first instance:
There are 2 criminal courts of first instance; the magistrates court and the crown court. Courts of
first instance determine a defendant’s guilt (plea or trial) and have powers of sentencing.
MAGISTRATES: comprised of 3 lay magistrates called the bench or a full time district judge
(criminal). Deal with all matters: bail, plea, allocation, trial, admissibility of evidence and sentence.
CROWN: presided over by a circuit judge. Responsible for all matters in court EXCEPT determining
guilt. Unless the defendant enters a guilty plea, this is decided by jury at a trial.
- Judge is known as the arbiter of the law, jury arbiter of facts.
- Jury can only decide guilt based on what it hears in court, any arguments as to whether a
piece of evidence is admissible must be done in the absence of the jury (voir dire).
TYPES OF OFFENCES:
1. SUMMARY ONLY:
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LPCdistinctionsuccess. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.46. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
