Other
NR 511 Week 7 Assignment: Clinical Practice Guideline Peer Review
- Course
- Institution
NR 511 Week 7 Assignment: Clinical Practice Guideline Peer Review
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
ProfGoodlucK
Reviews received
Content preview
NR511 WEEK 7: PEER REVIEWER TEMPLATEPeer Reviewer: [Stephanie
Assignment Pelling]
Excellent V. Good Satisfactory Needs Unsatisfactor
Content Possible
Points Improvement y
= 90 Points
100% 91% 83% 50% 0% Presenter: [Melissa Davis]
Disease & 15 Points 14 Points 12 Points 8 Points 0 Points REVIEWER COMMENTS
Background
The student: All 4 critical All 4 critical 3 critical 2 critical 1 or less critical Melissa, you did a terrific
elements are elements are elements are elements are element is job with identifying your
1. Identifies the present and present, but present present present topic hypertension from the
disease condition complete some CPG. The information you
information
2. Gives a brief provided was well
may be only
statement of partially organized, discussed the
incidence and addressed or disease condition, went
prevalence in the inaccurate over pathophysiology of
US hypertension, and
described clinical
3. The student presentation of
briefly hypertension. Also, you
summarizes the went over the incidence
disease and prevalence of
pathophysiology hypertension and your
slides were well organized.
4. Identifies the
typical clinical
presentation
seen in a patient
with the disease
(4 critical elements)
, Applicability in 15 Points 14 Points 12 Points 8 Points 0 Points REVIEWER COMMENTS
Primary Care
The student: All 4 critical All 4 critical 3 critical 2 critical 1 or less critical The information presented
elements are elements are elements are elements are elements are was clear and described
1. Identifies the present and present, but present present present how hypertension was
author, complete some applicable to the clinical
organization or information
practice guidelines in the
group that may be only
partially clinical setting. The author
developed the of the CPG was presented
addressed or
CPG as well as the year and
inaccurate
2. Student denotes revision.
the year of the
original guideline
publication
3. Student identifies
any subsequent
revisions
(student’s
reference should
be the most
recent version),
and
4. Student
discusses the
applicability for
use of this CPG
in the primary
care setting
(4 critical elements)
Key Action 30 Points 26 Points 24 Points 12 Points 0 Points REVIEWER COMMENTS
Statements & Body
of Evidence All 3 critical All 3 critical Only 2 critical Only 1 critical Zero (0) critical The guidelines statements
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ProfGoodlucK. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now