i do not want to work with charles in the development
Written for
Ashford University
PHI 103
All documents for this subject (149)
Seller
Follow
StudyConnect
Reviews received
Content preview
Grading Summary
These are the automatically computed results Date Taken:
of your exam. Grades for essay questions, and Time Spent: 25 min , 11 secs
comments from your instructor, are in the Points Received: (100%)
"Details" section below. Number of Attempts: 1
Question 1. Question : Charles is hard to work with, since he always interrupts others. Therefore, I do not
want to work with Charles in the development committee.
Student Answer:
Inductive
Neither
Deductive
Instructor The answer can be found in Section 2.4, “Classifying Arguments,” of With Good Reason: A Guide
Explanation: to Critical Thinking.
Points Received: 1 of 1
Comments:
Question 2. Question : “Cats are a billion times better than dogs” uses which rhetorical device?
Student Answer:
Proof Surrogate
Hyperbole
Weasel
Words
Euphemism
Innuendo
Instructor The answer can be found in Section 8.2, “Obstacles to Critical Thinking: Rhetorical Devices,”
Explanation: of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Points Received: 1 of 1
Comments:
Question 3. Question : Both times I went to the movies at Northpark Mall the people watching the movies
were extremely disruptive. That movie theater is horrible.
Student Answer:
Hasty Generalization
, No Fallacy
Appeal to the majority
Fallacy of composition
The answer can be found in Section 7.1, “Fallacies of Support,” of With Good Reason:
A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Instructor
Explanation: 1 of 1
Question 4. Question : If you eat candy all that candy then you will get sick. If you get sick then you won’t be
able to go to the dance. If you don’t go to the dance you won’t be able to dance with
Hilary. If you don’t get to dance with Hilary then you will be miserable. So you
shouldn’t eat it.
What is the conclusion of this argument?
Student Answer: You shouldn’t eat all that candy
Misery is bad
Hilary hates
candy
You shouldn’t go to the dance
The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting Arguments in the Standard Form,” of With
Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Instructor
Explanation: 1 of 1
Question 5. Question : An argument is invalid if and only if .
Student Answer:
It is possible for all of its premises to be true and the conclusion false
Its reasoning is strong and its premises are true.
It is fallacious.
It has a false premise.
The answer can be found in Section 3.1, “Basic Concepts in Deductive Reasoning,” of With
Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.
Instructor Explanation:
1 of 1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyConnect. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.