100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A* Grade Paper 1 Politics Edexcel Essay Plans $11.66   Add to cart

Other

A* Grade Paper 1 Politics Edexcel Essay Plans

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This document contains essay plans for the following questions: Evaluate the view various electoral systems in use in the UK make a difference to party representation Evaluate the view that changing the electoral system would give more power to minor parties Evaluate the view that the success of...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • June 8, 2022
  • 9
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Evaluate the view various electoral systems in use in the UK make a difference to party
representation
Strong and stable gov/ voter choice

Para 1 - FPTP
They do They do not

- FPTP is designed to allow a one - Duopoly has been in decline
party rule which is clear in 2019 - 2010 coalition with Con and LibDem
election with Boris Johnson winning - 2017 power sharing agreement with
majority of 78 Con and DUP due to conservatives
- Leads to duopoly which has being 9 short of a majority
consistently been between Labour - Minor parties coming into more
and Con (either party has been prominent positions
winning the most seats)
- Electoral Commission showed that
in 2019 election, whereas Con need
38,300 for a seat, minor parties like
Green needed 865,000
- Notorious for disproportionately
highlighted by how in 2016 Cameron
won 50.9% seats with 36.9% votes


Para 2 - AMS


They do They do not

- Party representation to lead to - SNP won a majority in 2011
coalitions due to hybrid system - Single party dominance
- Variety of party arrangements - Wales dominated by Labour
- SNP/Greens power sharing - SNP dominates Scotland since 2007
agreement in 2021 scotland - 2/3s of seats in Wales are
- Cons are a minority in devolved determined by FPTP
areas due to regional top up list - 56/129 seats in Scotland are FPTP
- More proportional: Scotland 2016, - Want more proportionality but is it
max difference between MSPs really due to FPTP element
elected and returned was 5%
2021 - SNP won 47.7% vote gaining
49.6% seats


Para 3: STV
They do They do not

- Coalitions are guaranteed due to - Seems adversarial like FPTP due to
power sharing built in via Good Sinn Fein vs DUP dominating
Friday Agreement in 1998 system
- Between Sinn Fein and DUP - Ulster Unionist Party and SDLP
- Parties like Alliance have gained have less influence
due to this system as STV aims to
boost minor parties (3rd most votes
in 2022

, Evaluate the view that changing the electoral system would give more power to minor parties

FPTP does not restrict minor parties:
- 2017 hung parliament between DUP and Conservatives
- Duopoly has been in decline as seen via coalition between Conservatives and
LibDems
FPTP does restrict minor parties:
- Has been dominated by Conservative and Labour
- 2017 - Conservative and Labour won 89% seats
- 2019 - Conservative and Labour won 87% seats
- Electoral Commission noted in 2019 that whilst it takes 38,300 votes to elect a
Conservative MP on average but it would take 865,000 to elect a Green MP
- 2019 - Green Party won 1 seat despite winning 3% votes

STV does not give influence to minor parties:
- Used in Northern Ireland, has led to dominance of Sinn Fein and DUP
STV does give influence to minor parties:
- Under FPTP, UKIP with 3.9m votes in 2015 had 1 seat under FPTP but under STV,
would have been 54 seats
- Preferred by Electoral Reform Society
- Good Friday Agreement has strived to always lead to coalitions
- 2022 mayoral elections: Alliance party gained 3rd largest amount of seats

AMS does not give influence to minor parties:
- Welsh Labour dominate Welsh Senedd (1 short of majority in 2021)
AMS does give influence to minor parties:
- Green party in power sharing agreement in 2021 as SNP were 1 short of a majority
- After 2011, not Labour or Conservative dominating devolved areas but SNP instead
- SNP had majority in 2011 in Scotland possibly due to calls for independence
- If 2019 election was under AMS, electoral reform calculated that Green Party would
have 38 seats instead of just 1 and Brexit party would have 12 instead of none

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lydiachandy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77016 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.66
  • (0)
  Add to cart