Case
SNHU-BUS-206-H4730 Business Law I 21EW4 7-2 Project Three Submission: Contract Law Natalie Marquez
- Course
- Institution
SNHU-BUS-206-H4730 Business Law I 21EW4 7-2 Project Three Submission: Contract Law Natalie Marquez
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
abram23
Reviews received
Content preview
SNHU-BUS-206-H4730 Business Law I 21EW47-2 Project Three Submission: Contract Law
Natalie Marquez
In the analyzation of The Friendly Dawg and landlord Lou, Dave’s deceased father
contract is still valid. According to (Kubasek et al., 2013, p. 335) valid contract are still binding
even after a death. The executor or other successor is still able to perform all the contractual
m
er as
duties. However, the contract may be valid yet unenforceable since the breach of contract must
co
eH w
be brought in within a set period and Dave’s father passed away two years ago.
o.
rs e
When Dave took over the store, he knew that the contract between his father and Lou was
ou urc
for pet food and supplies, such as bird cages, water bowls, pet beds and other stuff. Therefore,
o
when he started the renovation in the extra storage area, he should have disclosed that to Lou
aC s
vi y re
before he made the expansion. Dave should have disclosed to Lou the intention of the renovation
so that they could have a legally binding contract of the four essential elements. Dave would
ed d
have made an offer, Lou would have accepted or counteroffer, potentially considered a monetary
ar stu
amount to make the deal. However, Lou’s silence is a form of acceptance the general rule is that
is
it cannot be used to form a contract (Kubasek et al., 2013, p. 356).
Th
Although Lou failed to enforce the terms of the contract that states the business is a pet
supply store only, he is still in his right to receive rent from Dave. Dave taking matters into his
sh
own hands is unethical and against the terms of the contract. Dave is still responsible to pay rent
since the terms of the contract are not to air condition the storage area that was intended for the
contract terms of pet supplies. Although Dave is stating that Lou is breaching his obligation
This study source was downloaded by 100000826342158 from CourseHero.com on 10-19-2021 16:44:42 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/90491778/7-2-Project-Three-Contract-Lawdocx/
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller abram23. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now