Exam (elaborations)
Workgroup answers
- Course
- Institution
They are the answers of all the workgroups
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
mboul
Content preview
Moot court Victims of forced sterilization v OrosiaLitigating against the Forced Sterilization of HIV-Positive Women: The Case of Orosia
1. In response to rising Human Immunodeficiency Virus (“HIV”)-infection rates,
poverty, and overpopulation, some nations have resorted to a policy of forcibly
sterilizing HIV-positive women in order to prevent the transmission of HIV during
childbirth.
2. Forced sterilization “occurs when a procedure eliminating a woman’s [or man’s]
ability to bear children is performed without her [or his] informed consent. The term
encompasses emotionally coerced sterilization, in which hospital professionals
pressure a patient into consenting to the sterilization in a way that diminishes her
autonomy. One way to prevent forced sterilizations is to require informed consent
before a sterilization procedure.
3. Recently, advocates have begun to litigate coerced sterilization as a rights violation
in domestic and international courts. One of these cases is presented below.
Although the case is still in the litigation process, it represents a promising new
approach for anti-sterilization advocates and an important step toward recognizing
the reproductive rights of HIV-positive women.
4. Government sterilization programs originally emerged in Europe and the United
States in the 1920s as part of the eugenics movement. The democratic legislatures
of many nations authorized formal sterilization programs to prevent vulnerable
groups of people from producing “undesirable” offspring.
5. In 1927, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a Virginia
law requiring the sterilization of all mentally retarded persons in an 8-1 decision.
Writing for the majority, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated, “It is better for all the
world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them
starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from
continuing their kind.” After World War II, the eugenics movement lost support due
to its close association with Nazism, and government-sponsored sterilization
programs were eventually eliminated in most Western countries. However, some
developing countries adopted and continue to use sterilization in an attempt to
solve poverty by reducing overpopulation; the practices of India and China have
garnered the most international attention to date.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mboul. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.85. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79789 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now