100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Workgroup answers $3.40   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Workgroup answers

 22 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

They are the answers of all the workgroups

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • April 25, 2022
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Access to Health Care

Please, prepare the following role play session in advance



Case 1.

Moot Court session (role play) The right to health care under the European Court of
Human Rights

The European Court of Human Rights sitting in private on 29 May 2018, Having regard to
Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
Having regard to the application introduced on 6 April 2008 against Finland



THE FACTS

The applicant, a citizen of Uganda born in 1963, is detained facing deportation from Finland.
He is represented by Mr Matti Wuori, a lawyer in Helsinki. The facts of the case, as
submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.



The deportation proceedings

The applicant arrived in Finland in 1991, having married a Finnish citizen, Z. In 1993 and 1995
the applicant's requests for a further residence permit were refused, given his criminal
behaviour. He had been convicted on five counts of attempted manslaughter
(ανθρωποκτονία εξ αμελείας) for having raped several women and having had other sexual
contacts, knowing that he had contracted an HIV infection. He had been sentenced to over
eleven years' imprisonment.

The applicant has been treated against his HIV infection since 1992. In 1995 the applicant
and Z divorced. They have no children together.



On 23 December 1997 the Ministry of the Interior ordered the applicant's deportation to
Uganda and prohibited him from returning to Finland until further notice. The Ministry
noted that the applicant no longer held a valid visa or residence permit in Finland; that he
had no bonds to the country; and that he had repeatedly infringed Finnish law, thereby
demonstrating that he was a danger to the safety of others. Moreover, his return to Uganda
would not subject him to inhuman treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the
Convention or to persecution within the meaning of the 1991 Aliens Act (ulkomaalaislaki,
utlänningslag 378/1991). Nor would he be sent on to an area where he could face such
treatment or persecution.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mboul. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.40. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79789 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.40
  • (0)
  Add to cart