100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Reading Questions Philosophy of Humanities (1) 2022 - All you need for the Multiple Choice Questions $13.57   Add to cart

Other

Reading Questions Philosophy of Humanities (1) 2022 - All you need for the Multiple Choice Questions

8 reviews
 608 views  48 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

All weekly reading questions with clear answers including all keywords, concepts, and examples in some cases. This includes; Logical Empiricism, Critical Rationalism, Hermeneutics, Practice Turn, Kuhn, Foucault, Hegel, Gadamer, Dilthey, Critical Theory, Benjamin, Adorno, Leezenberg, Wittgenste...

[Show more]
Last document update: 2 year ago

Preview 3 out of 16  pages

  • March 24, 2022
  • March 28, 2022
  • 16
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown

8  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: yaravanherwijnen • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: silkejansen2 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: duifdemi • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: krispluister • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: timeafuezi • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: sameerhaseebkhan • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: spookaz • 2 year ago

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller

Available practice questions

Flashcards 34 Flashcards
$9.20 4 sales

Some examples from this set of practice questions

1.

What POV do the cave-dweller have?

Answer: Limited, dependant on forms, opinion-based

2.

What is the reaction of the cave-dwellers?

Answer: Violence, Resistance, Think he\\\\\\\'s crazy

3.

What difficulty does the escaped prisoner face when coming back to the cave?

Answer: Adjusting his vision: needed to adapt to govern. Speak to the cave-dwellers in their own dialogue (eg. Socratic method)

4.

How is Spinoza\\\\\\\'s God?

Answer: Non-anthropomorphic, acts in accordance to the laws of nature, unfolds without purpose but with necessity.

5.

What is monism?

Answer: Thoughts and extensions are parallel aspects of the same substance. Opposite to dualism

6.

How are the faculties divided?

Answer: Higher faculty: Theology, Law, Medicine. Lower faculty: Philosophy

7.

What are the roles and responsibilities of the higher faculty?

Answer: Can give commands. Serves the interest of the people. Teachings can be sanctioned by the government.

8.

What are the roles and responsibilities of the lower faculty?

Answer: No one under its comand. Serves the truth (have freedom of expression). Teaching is based on the faculty\\\\\\\'s own use of judgment and reason.

9.

According to the enlightenment, prejudice is an error of what?

Answer: Overhastiness and Authority

10.

What are legitimate prejudices according to Gadamer?

Answer: Authority and Tradition

Reading_Questions_PoH1
Book: History and Philosophy of the Humanities: an Introduction (Leezenberg 2018)

_______________________________________________

Week 1: Logical Empiricism, Critical Rationalism, and Kuhn
1. Both philosophy of science and philosophy of humanities have a double task, viz. a
descriptive task and a normative task (pp. 16-18 Leezenberg 2018). Explain these tasks.

Descriptive: description and explanations.

- Eg: The river is flowing quickly” “Brutus killed Ceasar”.

Normative: How things should be, it provides an evaluation.

- Eg: Jazz is better than classical music.

→ Are normative claims anything more than opinions? That’s what philosophers are debating.



2. What is the problem of demarcation (p. 91)?

The demarcation problem attempts to distinguish good science from pseudoscience and
opinion.

Series of debates that differentiates between:

- Episteme vs Doxa (Certain knowledge vs common opinion)
- Platos’ Rationalism vs Aristotles’ Empiricism



3. Logical Empiricism endorsed a verification criterion of meaning (p. 77). Explain what this
criterion entails.

Verification criterion: the only verifiability is through sensory experiences, such as observations
that are done through neutral observation.

, - Eg.: All swans are white

4. According to Popper, the verification criterion is useless for distinguishing universal laws
from metaphysical statements (p. 90). Explain Popper’s argumentation for this claim.

Useless because:

1) The criterion itself is not verifiable
2) The problem of induction: universal laws resist verification and confirmation
3) The neutral experience assumption is false

→ There is always something that can counter a universal law.

- Eg: All swans are white is not verifiable, there could always exist a black swan.



5. Popper endorsed falsifiability as a solution to the problem of demarcation (p. 91). Explain
what this criterion entails.

Falsifiability: begin with a larger hypothesis, then find an example that proves it and falsifies it.

- Use deduction
- Critical rationalism approach

The idea is:

- Knowledge is not founded on observation but can be corrected by it
- A good theory is not one that explains everything but that allows science to grow
(falsifiable)



6. How does the inductive method of verification differ from the deductive method of
falsification (p. 92)?

Inductive: Based on observation which leads to → general conclusions

Deductive: Starts with theory then uses → observations to falsify it

, 7. What is the key difference between an observation sentence (Logical Empiricism) and a
basic sentence (Popper) (p. 94)?

Observation sentence: argues that observations are neutral.

Basic sentence: argues sentences are theory-laden (affected by the presupposition of the
investigator)



8. Kuhn distinguished two different meanings of the term paradigm (pp. 118-119). Which
meanings?

1) Exemplar: a model of good scientific practices
- Sets the example that scientists will come back to
2) Disciplinary Matrix:
- Broader than Examplar
- Shared across disciplines
- Normalized practices across the field
- Is hostile to anomalies (being proven wrong)
- They can always find a way to explain deviations



9. Kuhn’s notion of normal science contradicts Popper’s views on falsification (p. 119). Explain
why this is the case.

Kuhn: there is no real falsification in practice.

- Normal science is in a constant state of puzzle-solving to elaborate and refine theories
- Scientists attempt to ward off falsification, attempt to not refute theories



10. Kuhn argued that: “When paradigms enter, as they must, into a debate about paradigm
choice, their role is necessarily circular. Each group uses its own paradigm in that paradigm’s
defense.” (Kuhn 1962, p. 91; quoted in Leezenberg 2018, p. 122). Explain what Kuhn meant
with his claim that the use of one’s own paradigm in defending that paradigm is circular.

Kuhn argues that:

- Paradigm choice: you only reject a paradigm when they have accepted another one as
suited to ‘solve the puzzle’.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Jab3d4. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75391 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$13.57  48x  sold
  • (8)
  Add to cart