100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Gender Discrimination (Goodyear) $14.49   Add to cart

Case

Gender Discrimination (Goodyear)

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

PHI445 Week 4 Discussion, The Effects of Business on Consumers and the Environment: Case Study Perdue Farms Perdue prides themselves in the freshness of their chicken, stating that “we go beyond what the USDA requires with extra inspections in American family-owned farms, refrigerated tru...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • February 24, 2022
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Case
  • Proff
  • A+
avatar-seller
PHI 445 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION

Gender Discrimination (Goodyear)
In the Case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the problems that would be
discussed is based on pay discrimination due to gender. Over many years of career at
Goodyear Tire, Lilly Ledbetter was consistently given low rankings in annual
performance including salary reviews, and small raises when compared to other
employees. Ledbetter filed a discrimination charge against Goodyear for gender
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, affirming that the
organization had paid her a low salary due to her gender (Brake & Grossman, 2007).
Lilly Ledbetter was awarded over 3 million dollars in punitive damages. However, the
judge decreased the money to 360,000 per Title VII’s cap on damages (Brake &
Grossman, 2007). The Case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. happened in
Gadsen, Alabama, United States (Bader, 2013). Capitalism economic system matches
this business since the organization is acting on what interests them not the interest of
the community, which motivates the business activity (Fieser, 2015). The laws that
govern or affect operations, in this case, is the Equal Pay of Act of 1963, which is also
part of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The law “prohibited sex-based wage
discrimination between men and women in the same workplace, who perform jobs that
require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility under the same working
conditions” (The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission n.d, p.1).
Ethical Theory
The ethical theory that I chose to apply to the Case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Co. is deontology. Immanuel Kant designed deontology theory, “which is a
moral principle that we should treat each person as an end, and merely as a means to
an end” (Fieser, 2015, sec. 1.3). The first characteristic of deontology is that we should
treat everyone “as beings with intrinsic value and regard them as highly as we would
our own happiness (Feiser, 2015, sec. 1.3). The second characteristic “is a single
instinctive principle of duty that we all should follow; the Golden Rule is the best
example of this. That is, I should do to others what I would want them to do to me”
(Fieser, 2015, Sect. 1.3).
When applying the ethical theory to the selected case above one can say that the
deontology theory, for instance, believes that persons should be treated as ends and
never used merely as means. The approach means that each human being has the
right to be treated as a liberated person equal to any other human being and that all
people have a correlative moral duty to treat each other as a free and the same person.
Discriminatory systems infringe the deontological theory in two forms. Firstly,
discrimination is based on the assumption that one population is low in rang to other
groups. Secondly, bias puts the groups that are discriminated against in lower social
and economic situations. For example, minorities and women have fewer employment
opportunities and are given lower salaries. Again, the privilege to be treated as a free
and equivalent individual is abused.
References

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller NURSEREP. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart