100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NR505 Week 1 Quiz / NR 505 Week 1 Quiz (Latest-2022): Chamberlain College of Nursing |Verified and 100% Correct Q & A| $9.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NR505 Week 1 Quiz / NR 505 Week 1 Quiz (Latest-2022): Chamberlain College of Nursing |Verified and 100% Correct Q & A|

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

NR505 Week 1 Quiz / NR 505 Week 1 Quiz (Latest-2022): Chamberlain College of Nursing |Verified and 100% Correct Q & A|

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • February 20, 2022
  • 15
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
1

,  Explain the Committee’s rationale, and share the detailed comments made by
members of the Committee in order to diffuse the situation and provide a better
understanding of the REC functioning
 Refuse to enter into any discussion with the PI but invite him to share their views
with the REC Secretariat, citing confidentiality as a rationale Your correct answer
5. Ethics committee members should consider the following issues when reviewing a

protocol:
 have research risks have been minimised?
 is appropriate information being provided to participants in a comprehensible
way?
 are there appropriate provisions to protect privacy and confidentiality?
 are the proposed inducements for participants to take part in research
appropriate?
 all of the above Your correct answer
6. It is often said that 'bad science is unethical'. Please choose the best follow-up sentence.
 However, research ethics committees are not qualified to judge the science of a
protocol and should therefore not consider the science in their protocol review
 However, if the protocol has been reviewed and 'approved' by a scientific or
technical committee prior to ethical review, the ethics committee should set
aside their doubts as experts have already provided input
 Ethics review committees should, therefore, consider the science of the protocol
where it has an impact on the ethics of the study Your correct answer
 However, this statement is false. Science and ethics are completely separate
issues and should never be considered by the same committee. This is supported
by all WHO guidance
7. Ethical review is necessary if researchers are to:

 ensure that the rights and well-being of research participants and communities
are protected
 comply with guidance and regulation for research

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller waldenquiz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart